If they truly have video of him with Paul and Maggie right before the murder time range, that’s doubtful to be refutable. He’s changed his timeline so much and never admitted being with them by where the video is rumored to be shot.
Been following this case for a long time but just found this thread. His defense is playing their case out in the court of public sympathy hoping to sway jurors. My sympathy is with the families of the murdered loved ones and all the victims he stole millions of dollars from.
Certainly feels like they could have just done this on Friday. I don't blame them for not sharing details - but the weekend build up doesn't make sense.
Ugh. I hope resources aren’t spent uselessly just because of social media items. I have to believe the police know what they’re doing and hope they don’t get sidetracked so Twitter theories.
So many are mentioning the car being parked weird... which I agree it is. But it’s an expensive car. Even here in MN, I see people do it all the time. Park far away and make sure no one can park next to them by taking up more than one space. It’s a way to protect the car from door dings...
Seeing some posts elsewhere where people are looking into the desktop that was briefly shown during the PC and the files on it. People are thinking perhaps there were clues to the killer on it. Has anyone here shared photos from the PC we could look at?
I’m with others in here who think that this new sketch is someone they know was there but whom they discarded due to the fact he had a reason to be there. Or perhaps he himself was a witness giving them false leads. IMHO, the police came upon something that made this suddenly become known and...
Good morning, everyone. Question- am I remembering correctly that BG was always a POI? Yesterday, I thought I recalled him saying this new sketch was absolutely the person who was on the bridge but also absolutely their killer.
Your number 1 is what I think as well. I think the first sketch was somehow based off the video and because the other sketch was someone known and who had reason to be there, it was discounted.
I’m so confused. So why did they only release the other one? Why would they have thought this wasn’t related?
The only thing I can think of is that this is someone close to the girls who was seen their that day and whose story was linked to their drop off or pickup. Meaning the police thought...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.