Search results

They had a lot of time to cover their tracks. They had a lot of time to destroy evidence. They had a lot of time to agree and practice their story. Be thankful that she has been convicted. If the decision had been made on forensic evidence alone she would have walked away from this.

The primary difference with Bridger is the refusal to reveal where her remains are. That tipped the balance. I think that in this case the judge had to tread a very careful line. If the sentences were deemed too severe there would be grounds for appeal. I believe he has pushed them as high as...

Does she really look like she cares about anyone other than her self?

Struggling to see his barristers point. He seems to be arguing for leniency because nobody knows what happened, apart from his client and his girlfriend. Um, NM chose to lie. So suffer the consequences.

Unfortunately if his lawyer doesn't put up a good argument against the whole life tariff that could alone be grounds for a sentencing appeal. Tough job.

Reality finally kicking in there eh! Nathan.

And perhaps there is part of her motive. If she couldn't have a happy and settled childhood why should....

If anyone needed proof of which one was the cold calculating controlling partner and which one was the submissive accomplice.......

3 months is a long time to recover from an operation.

Psychiatric

In which case someone has potentially lied to the court about the real state of her health. That will go down well with the Judge.

My guess is that she is currently in hospital.

I was guessing at them getting about 4 years.

I am sure there must be some technical reason for not being able to. Probably something relating to the sentences being the same.

JP is not medically fit enough to appear for sentencing.

Can't see why not. There may be parts of it that aren't but on the whole I would expect the most it to be reported as it happens.

I think the picture of him in women's underwear will be the least of his worries.

No that's a myth as far as the UK is concerned. Just under a third of parolees in the UK maintain their claims of innocence.

Not as big as you would think.

Well they certainly got to put their spin on things.