I will never understand how they got away with telling different version of events in the separate trials and still conclude they did it, can't have it both ways. And then neither case presented by the prosecutor tied back to the crime scene so it's like a Double whammy. That's what gives me the...
From memory it was 36m.
More reason to frame SA then for him to kill. Pretty sure if he was clever enough to come up with a murder that has enough people convinced he's innocent then I'm sure he would have waited to collect his money then if he fancied it, killed her. The way the evidence was...
I genuinely believe that those same people could bare witness to the crime happening and insist it was the innocent party [emoji23]
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I don't understand how anyone could possibly think he did the first crime? You simply cannot have it both ways, i.e. DNA supporting cases , alibis confessions in some cases and not others. Yes there's a risk cross contamination when any DNA gets handled, but when you have a confession, and alibi...
Less about the potential set up and more about the fact they just didn't question enough potential suspects, which I truly believe set off a series of events. I'm no detective but surely If you are start off on the wrong foot you are going to get yourself in a tricky situation and you end up in...
We'll see if it's a hoax won't we. To me there is little/no evidence to suggest he did it, regardless of whether he was the last one to see her Alive. Pretty sure the last person will hide away until caught and yep not convinced it was SA. I've read enough articles to suggest there are plenty of...
So I've been lurking on this particular thread for a while, great posts, provided great insight.
Whilst I can't say SA definitively 100% didn't do it, I most certainly can say there is no damning evidence to suggest he did do it, or at least evidence that I believe is genuine! And when people...
People don't just disappear. As an ex smoker, I could do without my phone so much, not my cigarettes though. And leaving without money is odd. If you walk away after that, then to me that seems reasonable, as it's the bare minimal.
I think it's odd that no one answered the door. Overnight...
How can he not account for three/four hours of his time? Surely if you are out of it you remember up to a certain point and thereonafter the nights a mystery but just three/four hours? To top it off was in a location very close to where the car were found, this is extremely suspicious. Are they...
I concur that this was not premeditated in terms of who the victim was. I mean for it to have been premeditated they would have had to have been followed from start to finish, and whilst there was a chance that this could happen, it seems with the change in plans that night very unlikely. The...
I do think something went horribly wrong at this point. The sequence in which they left the gas station is very telling too. If I remember correctly the van was there before the girls get there, and leaves immediately after them? I would love to know the explanation as to why it was just parked...
The point about getting rid of the car near/on a property does make sense.
In my opinion though, why leave the car in the road (as opposed to somewhere hidden) with two dead bodies in the trunk? It's obviously going to be reported at some point. The killer(s) obviously wasn't worried about the...
You get my first post! This case bothers me 16 years on we're no closer to knowing what happened.
To answer the above in a round about way.
1, No, maybe he's heard something though.
2,I think so. But I'm more convinced the palm print on the car is.
3, I think the suspects car was parked on...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.