Search results

Yes you are the dearest pussycat.:D

I don't think you want to fight with me. Trust me my friend, you shall lose. My thread was to give another view that was invovled in the case. Not that I believed in it. Just interesting. Oh....Woo Woo you are 52? BFD ! Listen to your self, you person of negativity. I.?.....I ...brought up it...

Burke didn't study literature, Patsy did? Huh? What are you saying? And so what? Well, there are other things to consider. What if Burke was molested by his father. Molested then became molesters. Maybe both kids were molested by the father. In most cases the mother has closed her eyes to the...

Oh. Yikes ! ! How was I to know that? You and I are not doing well communicating. I guess you must be much younger in reference to things than I am. Hey.....truce. OK? "Let it be, let it be".

Is there some reason that it wasn't her brother getting hormonal? (sp?) Or is that a no-no to suggest he had anything to do with it? When the phone wasn't hung up properly, it was heard (not a direct quote) Patsy saying to him "we're not talking to you". Why? My parents would say that to me...

Yeah, OK, OK. So who is Paul already?

FYI. Reverse speech analysis is a science of tape recorded files played back on special machines. I wasn't being funny. Not everyone believes in everything, but I think it is interesting to check new information out. Then accept or discard it as you see fit. Don't treat me like I belong in...

Came across this site and thought some of you may find it interesting. http://www..com/ramsey.htm Apparently this originated in Australia some twenty years ago. These people have researched quite a few Ramsey interviews. Have fun, I did.

Whoops....didn't mean you are not accurate...hee hee...you are the experts. I just meant I am once again interested in this case after a long absence. Thanks to all of you for bringing me up to speed. WS is the best.

Hummm....even better information and I will go read that recommended site. Get back to ya guys. Thanks again. You know I have my own opinion but I want it to be based on accurate information.

Twizzler and sissi, Thanks. That is an excellent explanation for me and answered a lot of questions I've had in my own mind. It's a hard one to figure out.

I have been following the Peterson case, but last night I saw the program on JBR. I had followed it originally and was confused because it went in all directions. I guess when it comes to such a beautiful, angel child I didn't want to add pain and focus to what I felt would never be solved...