Search results

Your post is nothing but denials and excuses, with claims of "evidence" with nothing to back them. The facts of the case are incidental to you, and each one is simply something else to look for an excuse for. Don't waste my time anymore. I'm done.

The only evidence of what happened to Teresa is there in Avery's burnpit, and garage. And in her vehicle. Weird, all places he lied about.

Yet, nobody knew the body had been burned until after the initial round of interviews. So, clearly no one knew anything about a body being there. Except Steven and Brendan. You can easily look this up.

Might want to try reading the case files before rolling out explanations. They were in and among the mud, and debris. Sprinkled onto the surface. Now you are saying things without even bother to check. Your reflex to resort to excuses makes this conversation very difficult.

So, there is no evidence that anything was planted, is what you're saying. You just don't think there is enough to satisfy you that they weren't? Steven plant the cremains? WTF? He burned her in the burnpit. But since nobody smelled it, it didn't happen? Are you kidding?

There's Steven for one. A truck driver who saw her vehicle leaving ASY. Wrong. Read his testimony. 'And zero witness saying she stayed.' Who'd have witnessed that? She's not around to speak for herself, having never been seen anywhere else, not making a call, nor checking a voicemail. The...

See, there's the thing though. She has actually not brought anything to light. Except that someone in the Dassey/Janda household looked at horrible *advertiser censored*. Ironically enough, and I'd love to hear an explanation as to how, Avery knew about the *advertiser censored* before law enforcement did. Unless, of...

Repeating claims of "evidence" does not turn blank speculation into evidence. You have no actual evidence. You have claims. One sided claims, none which have ever been substantiated. I can admit that some bits of evidence are weak, because they were found under curious circumstance. You, bar...

When Bobby says that, perhaps it will be credible. His account of her arrival hasn't changed. Until that time, it is 2nd hand Bryan's impression vs Bobby's own account + all the evidence that supports that she never left.

It is evidence of a mindset. The same mindset that had him on tv, in tears, saying he was already being framed for...... well, the disappearance of a woman. The same mindset that allowed him to know that they were going to plant evidence against him at the salvage yard, (even they had not found...

We have ZERO witnesses stating she left. We have a 2nd hand account saying someone else said she left. We have the defendant claiming he left, which is mired in a series of proven lies. Meanwhile, we have a boatload of evidence that ties the defendant to the crime, including his own lies.

You honestly have displayed ANY evidence. You've taken bits and pieces of one side of the equation, with no evidence to support them, merely claims, and speculation. The evidence that he did it has been presented to you over and over. Zero evidence that she was harmed? Other than her dead...

See, the thing is, none of the things they say are actually exculpatory, other than Brendan claiming he was with Steven...... at a fire. Which the 2 of them originally lied about. Surely you see the concerns in putting any eggs in that basket.

Thank you for clarifying, but I do know how they are done. That doesn't mean silly or changing claims suddenly become credible, or that continental shifts in strategy have no relation to the strength of the case. There is a reason it has been one setback after another, without exception...

You haven't shown anything. You are claiming because they didn't just out claim there was a fire for no reason, that they didn't see it. It is a misrepresentation of the facts. Because they didn't volunteer that they ate dinner, does that mean they didn't? It;s nonsense, I'm sorry. No one was...

Sure, if one's expectation is an air tight case. But reality is that convictions rely on the evidence available. In order for Steven Avery not to have committed this crime, a conspiracy is needed involving a combo all or some of a half dozen separate law enforcements agencies, including the...

Read what the cremation expert said. He also said the sole reason for saying so is that bones are usually found where they had been moved to, lol, and that he couldn't testify that the bones hadn't been burned in the burn pit. So really, again, all we have is a defense trying to make the best...

That is what she is trying, and based on the enormous shifts in claims, the consistently denied motions, and appeals, I'd say her chances are slim. You don't find it at all telling that the bold declarations of exoneration have yielded to high hopes of a new trial, but only if she can win an...

So let me get this squared away, Steven Avery lies about, well, everything he did that day. But despite that, he never gave a voluntary statement that he'd wanted to run away..... and that is enough for you to conclude that he didn't want to?? Well both Brendan and Bryan both said he did. The...