Not trying to be snarky whatsoever and I apologize if my last post made it seem so. I dont post often, but I do follow daily.
Let me try to make sense of this evolving analysis/theory. Originally, it seemed as though there may possibly be some kind of strange activity in those shadows...
You lose me more and more with each edited picture. You're picking up specific details like hairlines and tshirts and laptops being held and even GENDER of these "figures"?
JMO, we've been looking at these disorienting images too longmaybe the mind is making something out of nothing?
Trunks are not airtight. Blood, like water, will find cracks and seap/leak through. A gunshot wound at point blank into the midsection would leave considerable amount of blood that has to go somewhere.
I am still stuck at a glaring lack of commentary by LE and ME about any apparent head...
That is so sad to think about. Either way, she was in a dark place in those hours—whether it be by her own accord or by that of someone else. Ugh.
So he/she/they feels the need to kill an innocent woman but not take the $50 cash sitting right next to them?
IMHO, the earlier post was correct. It would be strange for a carjacker to steal the car, kill the occupant, yet leave the cash that could be used in a myriad of hard-to-trace scenarios.
I've not heard mention of this but it goes back to her original narrative:
Have LE said whether or not they found injury to her head (head trauma) resulting from an earlier blow suffered during initial alleged abduction?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.