Search results

I agree. This is Family Feud. The point is to give that kind of answer. It was the first answer I thought of when I heard the question too and I've been happily married for over 30 years and have no plans to kill my spouse. There was plenty of evidence to convict. This isn't a case of one bad...

Both of these thoughts went through my mind. I am a bit concerned about ineffective counsel. If I heard correctly it sounds like she was the divorce attorney who became his defense attorney. That really isn't how that should work. Divorce is not the same thing as a murder trial. So maybe the...

Wow - his attorney, Casey Schnack (sp?), is so shrill she looses any credibility she might have. She comes across as a deluded family member or girlfriend rather than a professional attorney. Obviously when defense attorneys are interviewed they defend their client and they are hardly going to...

I suspect her husband knew sometime pretty early on but after she returned. In the interviews I saw of him he seemed worried and upset but then the followup interview I saw on Dateline (or whichever of those shows) she had returned but didn't appear. The interviewer asked him some pretty easy...

Sounds like she and her husband are still together. I don't think he knew at the time she was missing but I do think he knew before the arrest. The one thing from the family statement that I hope isn't true is that it sounds like they arrested her in front of her children. Now they could be...

I also forgot to mention that at the beginning Prochaska also mentioned that only a person who knew Jodi would wait around for her when she was late like she was. I'm not sure I agree with that assessment but it's another sign that he clearly thinks it's JV.

This was absolutely my read. Whether it's JV or not, Prochaska certainly thinks it is. When he was asked about the results of JV's lie detector and he said 'I'm not allowed to talk about that... I wish I could (with a cheshire smile)' that pretty much told me what he thought. If it is JV, then...

I just watched the 48 hours show on this case and frankly I'm not convinced that family loved Barbara. You certainly didn't hear it expressed. The family, especially the daughter, was just nasty. I've seen a lot of these Dateline/48hours etc shows with family members who swear their loved one...

Wonderful news!!

It says she is the non custodial parent but is it possible she has visitation? If so, does that make it different in terms of an amber alert?

Lots of ‘yikes’ on her page. I’m scared for those kids. Edited to add- all the people posting on her FB page telling her she’s going to prison are not helping at all. That’s just going to aggravate the situation. If she didn’t plan to harm the kids (physically I mean) those kinds of comments...

The show didn’t claim testing wasn’t done. They claimed only the 10 allowed pieces of evidence were processed. As the poster above said, how would the car look like it did if it was fully processed beyond 10 pieces of evidence? That doesn’t mean there was evidence in there that they missed. In...

Well that’s good news but the fact that it’s ongoing with SVU means there is more to this. Poor little guy.

And that woman isn’t his mom, right? I wonder where she is?

They haven’t issued an amber alert which makes me wonder if they even believe this ‘Jay’ person has Devante. He seems to meet the other requirements but one of them is a confirmed abduction.

According to FB responses the real address is 1501 Broad St. Obviously his height is wrong too since 6 year olds are pretty much never 4’10”.

Jay may exist but that doesn’t necessarily mean she ever gave him the boy. She may be trying to deflect and the guy who hangs out selling water outside of a market was a story.

So this woman gave her son to someone who she only knows by his first name and then waited more than 24 hours past the time she was supposed to get him back to call the police?? I am very worried for this little boy.

I'm curious since I haven't been involved in a case like this. If a perp is on parole or has prior run ins with the law, is that relevant information that is allowed to be discussed?

I'm wondering about this too. It was speculated for a while that if she was abducted the perp probably had previously done something and now hearing the details it certainly sounds like it. He may not have murdered before, in fact probably not, but stalking, assault, rape, harassment all seem...