Search results

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
  1. J

    Verdict: GUILTY for both Millard and Smich of 1st degree murder #2

    Has DM actually stated somewhere that he plans on representing himself in the LB trial, or are people just inferring that because he hasn't retained a lawyer yet? (There could be many other reasons a lawyer hasn't yet been formally retained.) Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  2. J

    Verdict: GUILTY for both Millard and Smich of 1st degree murder #2

    At the very least, I don't think he's declared bankruptcy yet. If it were me I'd take the opportunity to be added to his list of creditors and you might get something out of it eventually. FWIW, wrongful death damages would be a debt owing permanently, which would not be erased even if he...
  3. J

    Verdict: GUILTY for both Millard and Smich of 1st degree murder #2

    Those three properties don't include the farm (since been sold for $800K) and another six-unit residential property in his name, cars, etc. I mean, he might not have millions lying around these days, but he'd be more worth trying to get a judgment against than MS. Sent from my iPhone using...
  4. J

    Verdict: GUILTY for both Millard and Smich of 1st degree murder #2

    But he had lots of assets and ostensibly acted very quickly to try and protect them from future lawsuits, including the condo he bought the day of the murder in the Distillery District for $627,524: https://www.thestar.com/news/crime/2013/06/05/millard_land_deals_beyond_smelly_experts_say.html...
  5. J

    Verdict: GUILTY for both Millard and Smich of 1st degree murder #2

    Yes, wrongful death is certainly a ground on which to sue in Canadian provinces, though the damages you'd get are not as extravagantly high as you might get in the U.S. In Ontario, family members are permitted to bring a wrongful death claim under section 61 of the Family Law Act. It sets out...
  6. J

    Verdict: GUILTY for both Millard and Smich of 1st degree murder #2

    I'm pretty sure they'd both be civilly liable for a wrongful death claim, it's just that in practice it would likely be no more than a technicality for MS since he has no $$. I don't think in Canada people get extravagant damages for that though, whereas if it were in the US, SB could probably...
  7. J

    Verdict: GUILTY for both Millard and Smich of 1st degree murder #2

    I suspect even DM could be compelled to testify in CN's trial, though I have no idea if that's typical in AATF cases or what the likelihood of that would be. Would be interesting though. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  8. J

    Verdict: GUILTY for both Millard and Smich of 1st degree murder #2

    Abro, do you feel the book will adequately cover the whole story with the publication ban still in place, or do you anticipate further volumes after the other trials are concluded? Just curious.. can't wait to read this. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  9. J

    Verdict: GUILTY for both Millard and Smich of 1st degree murder #2

    No he died in November 2012. The Eliminator was obtained in July of that year, I thought. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  10. J

    Verdict: GUILTY for both Millard and Smich of 1st degree murder #2

    I remember reading that WM must've known about and approved the expense for the Eliminator, and I would assume he must also have known and approved of his son buying an old pig farm for almost a million in cash. It was his company and his assets being used at that point, right?.. It's crossed my...
  11. J

    Verdict: GUILTY for both Millard and Smich of 1st degree murder #2

    I was interested to see recently that an investigator had to literally go to Apple headquarters in California to get the iPhone unlocked Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  12. J

    Verdict: GUILTY for both Millard and Smich of 1st degree murder #2

    I'm just reading this 2014 article where a coroner states LB's remains were not found at DM's farm. Hadn't seen that before. Does that mean they don't think she met the same end as TB...
  13. J

    Verdict: GUILTY for both Millard and Smich of 1st degree murder #2

    How long ago did DM buy that farm? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  14. J

    Verdict: GUILTY for both Millard and Smich of 1st degree murder #2

    Yeah that's true. Eligibility for parole won't really matter in practical terms at that point. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  15. J

    Verdict: GUILTY for both Millard and Smich of 1st degree murder #2

    That's really just speculation as the judge clearly has a lot of discretion, depending on what facts are proven. The Criminal Code states: Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  16. J

    Verdict: GUILTY for both Millard and Smich of 1st degree murder #2

    Ah, I see. I didn't do the math... [emoji3] Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  17. J

    Verdict: GUILTY for both Millard and Smich of 1st degree murder #2

    No it starts counting from the day they went into custody, I think. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  18. J

    Verdict: GUILTY for both Millard and Smich of 1st degree murder #2

    My understanding is that the new law gives judges the discretion to give consecutive parole ineligibility periods for multiple murders, but doesn't require them to do so. It's only been used 2 or 3 times so far, I think. The guy who killed 3 cops in Moncton got 75 years w/o parole, but the guy...
  19. J

    Verdict: GUILTY for both Millard and Smich of 1st degree murder #2

    Is it known yet whether police ever recovered LB's body? I'm guessing not, in light of the incinerator purchase in July 2012 Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  20. J

    Verdict: GUILTY for both Millard and Smich of 1st degree murder #2

    True. And who knows what else they were already responsible for that never did come to light. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
77
Guests online
2,395
Total visitors
2,472

Forum statistics

Threads
601,922
Messages
18,131,912
Members
231,188
Latest member
atriumproperties
Back
Top