Search results

Exactly. Clearly, in this case, it takes very little intelligence and cunning to avoid detection from the police. For nearly 6 years, anyway.

Yeah. We're both just guessing.

I think the DM article will turn out to be largely accurate. The idea that those 2 girls were being stalked by 2 completely different, unrelated parties within literally hours of each other, is just too wild of a coincidence. Anything is possible, but really. People keep saying the p ring thing...

If this is true, and Kline did indeed cut a deal with prosecutors, would it be safe to assume we won't hear anything about that officially until the gag order is lifted, or until the trial?

Seriously, they find a bullet at the scene, and a guy who fits the description places himself there. Not one person said "let's see if this guy owns a gun?" I'm just baffled by this.

You' think so, but with the other spectacularly stupid stuff this guy did, it's not that surprising.

Any theories on why there was an unspent bullet at the scene? I don't know much about guns - would he have ejected a bullet to show the girls it was loaded, without having to fire it off (that would've possible been heard)? Did he shoot but the gun misfired? And then ne had to eject the bullet?

The release of the PCA just makes this already bizarre case, even more so. So the police have a male that fits the description of BG who has placed himself at the crime scene the day of the murders. He admitted to seeing them. He wore the same clothes as BG. They found a bullet at the crime...

None of us have read anything that would convict this man, because the charging information is sealed.

I'm sure this has been asked before, but does anyone think this guy is the first sketch, and KK is the younger sketch? That they were there together?

He was prosecuted and convicted. Then he plead guilty. He is a TWICE convicted child killer. Find a new hero.

Innocent people not only have an alibi, they have have only one alibi.

Echols was in the woods at the time the murders took place. Committing said murders.

"Most likely"? According to whom?

"He is one of the sweetest men a person could ever meet. I hope I have the honor of meeting him again." Now that is disturbing.

Well, clearly you got yours from the fictional movie "Paradise Lost" and from a twice convicted child killer. You've offered nothing but rehashed BS from the movie and murder groupie nonsense theories. And you started a new thread for this?

Oh boy. Hook, line and sinker. Sad.

Open-minded? Since when?

Sensitivities? But you're foggy on the connection? Let me help you: the janitor had nothing to do with the murders. This case was solved decades ago. Leave the janitor alone.

"A guilty verdict doesn’t prove anything." It is statements such as this that destroy any credibility you claim to have. The evidence is what proved they were guilty, and that was the verdict the jury rendered, based on said evidence. The WM3 also pleaded guilty, acknowledging that if they were...