Why assume it was not seen or being hidden? I possibly see it.
Someone may have brought a dog to a murder at some point. Do you know for a fact no one has brought a dog to a murder?
There could be evidence of a dog, we don’t have a list of evidence.
Completely ruling out...
There’s a white dot kinda floating just below in front of his crotch in the video. The dot breaks into the space between his legs briefly. I believe this is independent spot is the tip of the dog’s tail. The dog has a predominantly gray over brown and white older face, black nose, chocolate body...
I think it’s a larger dog too! The rear is hanging out the bottom of the jacket. It’s what makes the photo so hard to understand. If he is a vagrant than it makes even more sense he’d have a warmth companion comfortable being in his jacket. Also, I don’t know any dog that would cross that bridge...
Is it possible investigators want speak with online catfishes because they were corresponding with the girls just before or at the moment the girls encountered the killer? <modsnip>
I’m still going with dog under the jacket. Probably weighs approximately 35-40lbs.
IMO either:
Guy is a vagrant...
Are we allowed to post a picture speculating about what the bridge guy had on him in the photo? I photoshopped what I think is under his coat on top of his photo and show how I believe his hand is holding it. I’d love to hear at least one persons opinion.
Is anyone up for speculating about...
First time posting.
The possibilities are endless, but my mind keeps trying to think about the girl’s perspectives at that age. He could’ve been stalking them in a friendly way. Talking to them about how scary the bridge was and showing them it wasn’t a big deal to cross it...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.