Thanks for pointing this out.
Clothing and Accessories tab includes the note "Male shoe was found"
Doesn't mean remains can't be a female, shoe could belong to a companion or perpetrator, but raises some doubt.
I'm putting together an episode of my podcast which will feature this case. I am wondering if you'd ask the individual who provided you with the documents whether they might speak to me, either on background or on a recording for the episode itself. They can get a sense of what I do by searching...
We have to keep in mind that being drugged, bound, gagged and locked in a sweltering closet supports torture charges I don't see in the police complaint. Hopefully when case goes through prosecution process a torture charge will be added.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I covered Sherri's disappearance on a recent podcast episode. Her segment starts around minute 16 for those of you who want to skip to it.
http://trucri.me/tcr11
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Edit to #23: I have read she was also an escort in several news articles but whereas "she co-owned a service" is mentioned by several people no one ever names a specific source who said Sherri was an escort as well as a co-owner.
I understand the gut feeling thing but I wasn't really on board with the Hilton theory. This one though is a different story. Not willing to rule it out.
A good find re: Jazmiry, good work!
A comparison image:
And some links. I have a standard NamUs account but it's giving me the same error.
http://www.nampn.org/cases/hernandez_jazmiry_hernandez.html
http://www.missing-usa.com/news/missing-jazmiry-hernandez-hernandez-nc?uid=1078...
I only do self promotion when it's relevant to a thread (aside from my signature) but here's a link to my latest podcast episode, Gaby is the cold case in the final segment. It was cold when I started research and while it isn't so cold anymore I decided to cover it anyway...
Top URL contains this:
This behavior is suspicious. Maybe it's nothing but on the other hand it sounds like an attempt to form an alibi and also a classic action of certain types of killers prone to contacting victims' families after the murder.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
This is what I call the spousal paradox. Maybe it has a real name and I just don't know it. You're right: there is no way for a spouse or partner to act that won't draw suspicion from at least a small vocal subset of observers.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
My theory is they took her for human trafficking / forced sex work but when they saw the intense and increasing media attention the case was getting they decided to let her go before they got caught, fearing that killing her or not letting her go would keep LE attention on finding them. They...
You're right. I just don't see anything that pushes me toward this being suicide when there's a man she met online whom she intended to meet in person the morning she disappeared.
My opinion right now is that she met him and he killed her and did what he could to make it look like a suicide...
I know everyone is leaning toward suicide here. But why did she text her sister asking her to leave the door unlocked because she was going to visit if she was really just on her way to kill herself at the bridge?
Edit: a source for my text reference...
I thought I saw an article with a more complete quote of the note Gaby left but now I can't find it. Can anyone help?
Edit 1: I found this at https://archive.is/TYa6j but still think there's a more complete quote of the note out there somewhere:
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.