Search results

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
  1. M

    Australia Claremont Serial Killer, 1996 - 1997, Perth, Western Australia - #19

    Don’t disagree. Just the theory that he said something which freaked her out is no consistent with leaving her daughter there, adult or not.
  2. M

    Australia Claremont Serial Killer, 1996 - 1997, Perth, Western Australia - #19

    Almost all murder cases are circumstantial cases. Because you don’t usually murder someone in sight of witnesses. I was just correcting the other bit you said, comparing Wark and Baden-Clay. No body in Work. Body in Baden-Clay
  3. M

    Australia Claremont Serial Killer, 1996 - 1997, Perth, Western Australia - #19

    But she left her daughter living with him.
  4. M

    Australia Claremont Serial Killer, 1996 - 1997, Perth, Western Australia - #19

    There was a body in the Baden-Clay murder. Her neck bruisings were part of the evidence.
  5. M

    Australia Claremont Serial Killer, 1996 - 1997, Perth, Western Australia - #19

    Seems like a pretty dumb place to dump incriminating evidence.
  6. M

    Australia Claremont Serial Killer, 1996 - 1997, Perth, Western Australia - #19

    You cannot FoI that kind of thing. Exempt I think. For obvious reasons. Otherwise crooks could see how the investigation is progressing or study techniques. You might get a copy of your own statement.
  7. M

    Australia Claremont Serial Killer, 1996 - 1997, Perth, Western Australia - #16

    No 'committal mention' in WA. It's called a 'Trial Allocation Hearing'. Same thing, though
  8. M

    Australia Claremont Serial Killer, 1996 - 1997, Perth, Western Australia - #15

    Interesting, but, IMO, have to be careful not to conflate cause and correlation. I myself am white, married, divorced parents ... but I am not, fortunately, a sexual sadist or serial killer ... Not sure how enlightening these 'surveys' really are
  9. M

    Australia Claremont Serial Killer, 1996 - 1997, Perth, Western Australia - #15

    Agree. There is a lot of twaddle on here.
  10. M

    Australia Claremont Serial Killer, 1996 - 1997, Perth, Western Australia - #15

    No he doesn't, though. That's the point. He says he doesn't accept the 'proposition' put to him. He doesn't say he can't accept that 'they were random attacks' thereby implying that there were not random attacks.
  11. M

    Australia Claremont Serial Killer, 1996 - 1997, Perth, Western Australia - #15

    But if you are right, would he not then be revealing something about the case - which he says he cannot do?
  12. M

    Australia Claremont Serial Killer, 1996 - 1997, Perth, Western Australia - #15

    Ian Moore' statement under oath is not necessarily that it was not a random attack, he was just not agreeing with that proposition - because he was not allowed to disclose anything. It is just as possible that he was just saying: 'look, I can't say anything, including whether it was random or...
  13. M

    Australia Australia - Claremont SK, 1996-97, Perth, WA - #14

    About as intellectually rigorous as a Dan Brown thriller.
  14. M

    Australia Australia - Claremont SK, 1996-97, Perth, WA - #14

    It is theoretically possible, IMO but I doubt someone planning to murder a patron would use anything other than cash - if they were there at all
  15. M

    Australia Australia - Claremont SK, 1996-97, Perth, WA - #14

    I would just buy a 2nd hand legal dictionary, or get an old copy of ‘Ross on Crime’, or a crime law textbook. Or you could do it the hard way and read the Criminal Procedure Act (WA) ...
  16. M

    Australia Australia - Claremont SK, 1996-97, Perth, WA - #14

    They both abolished the common law “nolle”, to be perfectly correct
  17. M

    Australia Australia - Claremont SK, 1996-97, Perth, WA - #14

    Jaysus
  18. M

    Australia Australia - Claremont SK, 1996-97, Perth, WA - #14

    Not at all surprising, given that the ‘Karate Kid’ drove yellow …
  19. M

    Australia Australia - Claremont SK, 1996-97, Perth, WA - #14

    On your advice, I just did look it up. The ‘nolle prosequi’ was abolished in WA eleven years ago. You are right in one sense, it is better to look things up properly !
  20. M

    Australia Australia - Claremont SK, 1996-97, Perth, WA - #14

    I'm happy to say - I have no idea. On the other hand, I have met a few bona fide psychopaths in my time - and some of them were dumb. So, you can be both cruel and dumb, in my view.

DNASolves

Who is Fairfield County Jane Doe (1993)?

Staff online

Members online

... and 170 more.
Total: 636 (members: 171, guests: 465)

Online statistics

Members online
171
Guests online
465
Total visitors
636
Totals may include hidden visitors.

Forum statistics

Threads
608,277
Messages
18,237,180
Members
234,329
Latest member
AqueousEcho
Back
Top