Search results

Yeah I'd thought about the conspicuous lack of those as well but I figured it might be possible those tattoos were no longer visible due to the condition of the body. Really, it's most likely not a proper match but I figured I'd say something just in case and to get opinions like yours. EDIT...

Okay so the reason I made this thread. I was randomly going through the NamUs site, trying to see if I could somehow come up with any matches based on visual identifiers and I so incredibly randomly came upon this one. I think this might be this guy...

Warning: graphic photo at attached link. (nothing too bad, but there are photos of tattoos on a decaying body so just in case, there's the warning) https://identifyus.org/en/cases/14697 Unidentified White Male Discovered in San Miguel County, New Mexico, ~3 miles off of Hwy 104 on December 2...

Oh my God. He was married all that time. I wonder how you can just not notice you're married to a serial killer or how it feels to have been oblivious to it after the fact?

That's beautiful. Dogs are just the most wonderful beings on the planet. Treat them well and they'll save your life figuratively and literally if need be.

Let's see, does it make any reasonable sense yet? Nope, still cuckoo for cocoa puffs.

You know we live in troubled times when not even the Twinkies are safe.

I was having this issue but yeah I feel like it's the ads? Turn it all off and it's fine, although I get that that's not the kind of advice an ad-supported site wants to hear.