Search results

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
  1. A

    IN - Abigail Williams, 13, & Liberty German, 14, Delphi, 13 Feb 2017 #49

    I didn't realise. Thanks for clarifying. My point still holds then, that there may be many victims whose bodies were either never recovered or, as in the Iowa case, the bodies were too decomposed to take the killer's DNA. (Just a thought - would the killer's DNA decompose over time...?)
  2. A

    IN - Abigail Williams, 13, & Liberty German, 14, Delphi, 13 Feb 2017 #49

    But if they found a victim, then wouldn't they also have his DNA and therefore a match?
  3. A

    IN - Abigail Williams, 13, & Liberty German, 14, Delphi, 13 Feb 2017 #49

    I guess it is possible he has killed previously but the victims' bodies haven't been recovered, hence no DNA match.
  4. A

    IN - Abigail Williams, 13, & Liberty German, 14, Delphi, 13 Feb 2017 #49

    Is there a DNA database for the whole of the United States, or does each State have their own? I just find it incredulous that this vile excuse for a human being hasn't been caught. If there is no DNA match, could this mean it is the first time he has struck? Surely this can't be his first...
  5. A

    GUILTY UK - Lea Adri-Soejoko, 80, slain, Colindale, London, 28 Feb 2017

    So sad. What on earth could be the motive for killing a defenceless 80 year old. Madness.
  6. A

    GUILTY UK - Helen Bailey, 51, Royston, 11 April 2016 #11

    Yeah, the way he's sitting in that chair, like a bag of **** tied ugly. The horrible fat slug. Totally out of place with his surroundings. God, he's vile. That mugshot of his shows his true character; it even looks as if he's got a slight smirk playing around his mouth. Fecking pig.
  7. A

    GUILTY UK - Helen Bailey, 51, Royston, 11 April 2016 #11

    If he was going crazy over being expected to fork out £3, he must have been quietly apoplectic and seething about the cost of the engagement ring. The creature has no redeeming features at all. Ugly, liar, tight, greedy, conniving, manipulative, repulsive murdering piece of *****e.
  8. A

    GUILTY UK - Helen Bailey, 51, Royston, 11 April 2016 #10

    Does the reason for the house being put in joint names make any difference in law? I guess they could have been 'tenants in common' rather than joint tenants, whereby (I have just learned) he can bequeath his half. Maybe at the time he didn't want to raise this, given that Helen was putting in...
  9. A

    GUILTY UK - Helen Bailey, 51, Royston, 11 April 2016 #10

    Well you live and learn. I never knew that. I guess it depends on whether the house is 'joint tenants' or 'tenants in common' too. I'm sure you can't bequeath your half of a property if you are joint tenants. Its the only explanation I could think of as to why he would do such a...
  10. A

    GUILTY UK - Helen Bailey, 51, Royston, 11 April 2016 #10

    But if both Helen and Nobhead's names are on the Title Deeds, then surely the property will become the sole property of the surviving spouse. That's what happened when my husband died. The house was in joint names and became mine. I don't believe he could have bequeathed half the house to...
  11. A

    GUILTY UK - Helen Bailey, 51, Royston, 11 April 2016 #10

    Miss Twiddle, I thought the exact same thing. He was worried that he would die before Helen and all his assets would pass to her if they were man and wife. If she then re-married again, his sons could miss out on not only Helen's money, but also his own.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
122
Guests online
3,366
Total visitors
3,488

Forum statistics

Threads
602,746
Messages
18,146,357
Members
231,521
Latest member
BEllis9801
Back
Top