Right so there are no definitive facts one way or the other. It's possible that they have a strong POI and are building the case, it's possible that they are at square 1, and its possible that they are somewhere in between.
The evidentiary bar of convicting someone of first degree murder is very high (as it should be).
Before you can name/arrest a suspect you need assurance you can convict. There is time/evidence needed to build the case.
Maybe be an arrest will never happen.
My assessment is based on my...
Pretty clear that either one of two things is true:
1. Case is dead cold.
2. LE knows with high degree of certainty who did it but does not have enough evidence to arrest.
I'm with option 2. I can't see them scaling back and stopping the publicity so soon without a suspect. Even so...
I think if they had evidence of a second perp they would say so. To not would mean that someone might dismiss a suspect that if they did not resemble BG.
Agreed. Only thing accomplished by naming suspect is giving a defense attorney fodder to say the client was targeted by police and they didn't look elsewhere.
IMO, saying they have 50-60 POI means they have no strong POI. For awhile I was thinking it was quiet because they had a good lead but now not so sure.
Not good.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.