Search results

I think they were talking about Patsy Ramsey, not John.

What?

Items from the house could be traced back to him via DNA, fingerprint, blood, saliva, etc.

nope. Many serial killers take the evidence that can incriminate them and get rid of it. Example, Gary Ridgway, Ted Bundy, Ed Kemper, etc. etc. etc. Really only an unorganized type would leave such things behind and take other things. This crime had too much planning (if it was an...

if this were a serial killer there would have been some sort of crime almost exactly like this one. There are certain aspects of serial murder that cannot change, signature cannot change. MO can change and often does change. There would be a crime soemwher involving small children, AE...

WHy would a hardcore criminal leave something like a garrote behind---BTW isn't the rope used technically not even a garrote? Would a hardcore criminal not take that with him? COnsidering the time he/she spent in that house, one would think ALL evidence pointing towards his existence would be...

Look at cases past were family members murder family members---many have no criminal record whatsoever. That would fit if this murder was an accident----wether during sex play or not. Jeffrey MacDoanld had no criminal history. Susan Smith had no criminal history. Diane Downs had no...

It really tied all the evidence together for me. It is just hard to to think a woman would do that to her kids.

I saw it for the first time, I taped it on my new DVR! (Fantastic!) It was much easier for me to underrstand some of the blood spatter by seeing it demonstrated on TV. The show helped me put a bunch of terms with an actual visual----that helped me alot.

And if this person were so bizarre, so weird, then why have they not shown themselves already? How have they not given temselves away?

I too am not sur eof the molestation charge although I would not be surprised. It happens all the time in "normal" families. Anywho, imo it probably hasmor eto do with COlette and her growing independence. She was getting her education, raising her kids, and starting to speak her mind...

One of the things that many pro-Ramsey people think is evidence of innocence is the fact that JR found JB's body. John Douglas has even stated before that parents who murder their kids do not want to find the body because then the spotlight shines on them. I know you have all heard of the...

WHat about any punctuation marks? Were there the same "problems" with punc? How about past, present & future tense? It didn't seem to me this writer had difficulties with those things------

Do you two want to start a thread about collection of evidence or do you wnat ot get back to the thread subject? Not trying to sound rude, but you both have just gone back & forth with this wholet hing and it hasn't gon anywhere.

With all due respect, JD told investigators in Seattle that Ridgwway was not the GRK and did not need to be interviewedm further. So obviously just having a degree is not enough to know aht questions to ask. Also, homiced (like any other crime) is not generic. Every case is different in...

How could he possibly know what questions to ask when he had not seen those most important docs you speak of? Crime scene photos, the police reports, etc? Secondly, he did not even question Patsy Ramsey, so how could he even make an assessment on her actions or answers?

IMO this could not just be a dude in the neighborhood who saw her a few times and decided to break into her house on Christmas night, lie in wait for the family to return. First of all, what kind of family life did this guy have to be able to sit in the Ramsey home for unknown hours waiting for...

One also cannot judge wether or not someone was capable of murder based on past behavior & history. Look at Jeff MacDonald, there really was no violent eruptions in his past---but the man is guilty as sin. His prosecutor said to the jury, "If I can prove that he DID do it, I don't need to...

But HOW could they even make an accurate assessment of wether or not the parents did this if they were not going to be given ALL the documents pertaining to the crime, ie the autopsy report? Should John Douglas not have demanded those docs when he took the case?