The eldest 29 year old was the first to reach out for help in Texas. The 17 year old is the one who escaped through the fly wire & may or may not be the identity on YouTube
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I noticed that you have been making informed comments on this discussion since thread #1. At this present time with all the leads, what can you say is missing? What aspect of the case might have been overlooked or perhaps misinterpreted? Is there something that we are not focusing on that...
That's you're opinion. There are a lot of reasons other than lies that lead to inaccurate reporting. I have not breached the terms of service. I have read it carefully.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Can we not take this as a personal criticism towards investigators whom I imagine are overwhelmed with cases, policy, time & financial restraints?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Obviously the foster parents are cleared of directly abducting William Tyrrell, but these other aspects should be considered equally among others in respect that we are not exclusively privy to the fine details of the case that is not public. These other aspects may lead to completely different...
Is it possible then to examine this without concluding that the finger is directly pointed at the foster family but rather consider the observations put across?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
That's an assumption as I am considering all angles of this case. The part I doubt is that this was planned in a short time period because it was successfully concealed. To achieve a successful operation of abduction of a child that age, it appears they would need more than one day of careful...
All I can say without catching up on 62 pages of thread is that *someone* must have known something in a close knit community. If it was a newcomer, it would have been known. Then there is the window of time for an opportunist that seems unlikely but not impossible to know a child is there...
Just if FF had a Telstra phone he would have recieved the highest coverage according to Telstras coverage map, "4GX device only typical download speed 2 to 75Mbps".
If he had an Optus phone he would have recieved the highest coverage according to Optus coverage map, "INDOOR COVERAGE:Voice &...
Yes! That's the weird part. They were playing together. It's why I thought at first it might have been KT as she may have had an incentive not to say anything. But it doesn't seem so at all now.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.