Search results

At the height of this criminal activity the suspects attempts to steal a hammer and dog repellent. Why would he steal a hammer which is very affordable, $2 then? I speculate that with all the known criminal activity in the area he is unable to be seen purchasing these items that he frequently...

He certainly loved Bonnie if what we know is true and was mad at her, thus the statements of hate towards her for ending their engagement. Nothing was compulsive, he was quite methodical. He also loved his kids, the "two good ones." He was capable of love despite his psychopathic tendencies...

Yeah, this is why I think Prop 69 (DNA) should include those social servants in a position of public trust. They adopted this legislation specifically for this criminal-suspect and the guy was on the opposite end of the law-the law itself. A presumption of "good guy" was a terrible fallacy in...

According to Auburn PD (See their Facebook page) he was terminated in "September 1979."

Anyone know what day he was fired from Auburn Police Department? EDIT: "September 1979" https://www.facebook.com/Auburn-Police-Department-CA-176232875813698/

Interesting sign on the fence reads "Beware of Dog" at the front-right of his house and I don't think he had a dog at the time of his arrest. People do this as a visual deterrent in some cases. In hindsight of course, it would sure make sense in his psyche to post that sign for obvious known...

One Daughter (MD) is now believed to be 36 years of age with a birth year of roughly 1982. This is believed to be a crime free period starting in 1982-1985 and only one more in May 1986. Precursory at the moment, but speculating that he stopped for his family...

Looks like he (suspect) bought the house he is (was) living in now was purchased on April 11, 1980 for $77,000. Was this a break in the crime spree? Perhaps this is the gap from March 13, 1980 to August 19, 1980. Preoccupied with his new home? Don't know...1981 was a very similar pattern in Feb...

"fall 1973" http://www.sacbee.com/news/local/crime/article209823959.html

So, California Prop 69 (DNA) should be amended to include public servants as a condition of employment or do we simply rely on the two words "public trust?"

Does anyone have the original forum link where the community was working this matter? In particular, one of the longest and most active threads on this case. It appears as if he enjoyed his little secret and may have visited the board.