Search results

I agree with that assessment.

Do you think FH was murdered at the time the neighbors heard the loud thumping or later when KR left the apt? In other words, using your theory was KR there and let in the person to do the murder or did she leave and left the door unlocked for them?

Thanks. A lot of females sleep with a big shirt on and no undies, but it being pulled up over her face to expose her lower naked body is either staged to look like a sexual assault or the act of covering her face says a lot about the perp's relationship to the victim.

After the Skylar Neese case don't ever think a female can't do the unthinkable to their co-called BFF.

ITA with you about the butt dial call.

Exactly. It explains why there is no forced entry by the stranger. Oh I left the door unlocked, that's why.

Very good points. The unknown male DNA is the answer to this crime. If it was a random crime from someone who followed them home and lucked out that a door was unlocked, I assume CODIS will get a hit eventually, because this man will do it again.

Was the all the DNA on Faith and on the note and pen semen? Just wondering because (and this isn't *advertiser censored* shaming) two young attractive college girls with what seems like more than a few men in and out of their lives and apt, could easily have a used condom from a random encounter still in their...

I guess they are they for the reading and answering of the question in open court, per twitter. We know there is not a verdict reached yet because they're asking a question. Unless it's about the verdict form.

Maybe if they get the answer they need to this second question it will get them to reach a verdict.

Hopefully the judge can answer this one.

I forgot how both sides have to be present when the jury asks a question or has a request for some testimony to be read back.

Thank you for this. Interesting. Anyone thinking they'll go for the facilitation of 1st degree due to the lack of evidence on who really did the abduction? Compromise verdict kind of thing.

OT I was watching some video a few weeks ago when I was sick for a few days, watching some old cases and it really surprised me how poorly most of the defense attorneys did, even when there was eventually a NG verdict or hung jury. I guess that's why if you're great you become wealthy.

Technically you're correct. However, it's not common at this point in the game.

yes they should be allowed. Everything else is usually back in the jury room with them other than witness testimony. They have to ask for that to be read back to them. For instance, the ping information and displays should already be back in the jury room with them.

Ah good point. We'll never know until the verdict.

Yes but the judge should have been able to clarify a charge or at least tell them to re-read his instructions, but according to reports (which can be inaccurate) the judge refused to answer because the question pertained to evidence, not the charges.

I wonder what question would not be appropriate for the judge to answer because it would be commenting on evidence? Strange.

Ah okay TBI director has been there since lunch. Also knowing the question does not give us any such insight considering we've been down this road before as experienced trial watchers, and what questions or evidence a jury asked for or be clarified can go either way. Appears they are working it...