Search results

FWIW.... I saw your point. I may not agree with their intentions... but I appreciated your calling that out. I know you don't need to be told WHY their searches are in a different spirit than WS'ers and LE.. I don't think you were confused on that :) People here are FABULOUSLY sincere...

IMHO... Here is what I think happened: I think BD left New York to get in a fun week-end and to get away from family troubles. ( ie.. divorce ) I think she had a guy friend she knew for years that was going. I think she had a chance to drive down and stay FOR FREE with some girls she...

LOL!!!:blowkiss: But... and you knew there would be a but... WHY did it have to come out of the mouth of an ex-cop who was found perjuring himself!!!!! Nothing in this case is cut & dry! Ugh! :bang:

Thank you... How does everyone keep all of this madness in order!!!! Very damning in my opinion to CA's deposition. ( and that says alot coming from my PROVE IT TO ME WAYS ) :twocents:

Believe me... I definately would not like to "help" the defense. If anything I would like some key weaknesses in the SA's case tightened up. The position I take in all of this is not what I believe but what they can prove. That is how I will be able to sleep at night. Our laws are as...

BOLDED BY ME.. Exactly my point. I am hoping for testing to come back that does show a connection. I think that would help make a strong circumstantial case. However, as I said to begin with... at this point I believe they are missing strong physical evidence that PROVES Casey...

Unfortunately, I haven't seen anything that PROVES Casey used chloroform. A search on her computer is not enough to PROVE that she used it.. even if chloroform is found.. where is the link that shows CASEY was the one that used it. I guess the point is circumstantial evidence can have a...

I SADLY AGREE. I have always had a feeling that it could have been an accident. IMO opinion there isn't enough information RELEASED that proves murder...let alone premeditation. ( maybe suggests ) I am hoping for some surprises at trial that will go this direction.. but as it sits, I have...

Yikes... I personally thought that CA & GA adored Caylee... and spent quite a bit of time and attention with her. I still maintain this evil was CASEY'S doing..

It doesn't.. It was replys that started in post # 325.. pg 13 of this thread. It just kind of took on a life of its own..:D:D

I guess I will repreat what I said I believed... I believe CA stated in her myspace she thought Caylee was MISSING from HER life... not physically MISSING. I guess it is left to interpetation... WHICH is why I believed her answer in the deposition ..that she didn't believe Caylee was...

WOW!!! Anyone else get the feeling that an important test of some kind just came back to lead them to aggrevating circumstances??

What is your point? That on July 15th... 13 days after she posted the myspace that she finds out Caylee has been missing for 31 days.... Please clarify your post.. I don't get it.

I agree that ZG has every right to clear her name. I'm actually amazed that she lost her job. If everyone pretty much agrees that Casey lied.. and made up Zanny the nanny.. WHO in their right mind actually fired her as though it COULD have been her? Just amazes me actually.

respectfully snipped THANK YOU SoCalSleuth!!! Where have you been! LOL! Fantastic post. I have been looking for clarification as to this very point. :blushing: You make quite a point.... going to have to sit with this point for a while. :waitasec::waitasec::waitasec: ( However...

I agree....

Personally, I think CA wrote that title as if Caylee was missing from CA's life... not that she believed Caylee was MISSING from everyone... I think that was pretty obvious. :bang:

respectfully snipped I have been asking for clarification on this... Everyone I have asked in my state has told me it doesn't matter who initiates a suit.. both sides have the right to depose witness'. I can't imagine how it would be different in Florida. I guess I was hoping you could...

I am confused?? I am not being snarky when I ask this.... Can someone explain to me how there is ONLY a deposition because Casey made a counter claim. Wouldn't the Anthony's been deposed in ZG's suit anyway?? How does this work? Any legal eagles that can explain to me??