I'm sure those media outlets genuinely believed the judge was interfering with access to a public proceeding. In any other circumstance, this would be appalling (Imagine if your city council was holding a public hearing about a new nuclear power plant going up in your backyard, but they refused...
As a member of the media, it is clear that all of you do not really understand what REALLY happened with this motion.
But let me assure you: most in the media are not "whining" about the 5th DCA's ruling. They're applauding it.
As any professional journalism organization (Poynter Institute...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.