Search results

Nothing but lies. Anyone who's been paying attention knows that. Who knows what exactly they're trying to cover up, but to me and many others it's obvious that the official narrative is far from the truth.

These videos prove nothing. There's still absolutely no proof that Paddock fired any of the shots. Nothing with this story adds up. I don't know what the truth is but I know the official story isn't even close to what actually happened. Couple of things to think about- first there's no way...

Any threats he may have made, perhaps? I don't really know. But I'd think they must have legitimate reasons, and hopefully lawful.

There are plenty of posts on here that at least imply they would be fine with ALL guns being gone from the United States. Either that, or the suggestions for "gun control" are such that if implemented, WOULD essentially mean an end to gun ownership, with the possible exception of extremely...

I would agree but I have a feeling there's more to the story than we know. Also, can you imagine the liability if the brother decides to do something similar to what his brother did?

I do think certain things would help. First, enforce already existing laws. Nicolas Cruz likely would not have had firearms if the police/FBI would have done their jobs. Second thing would be get rid of the "gun free" zones. Anyplace that's deemed gun free is a prime target for any would be mass...

Well the point is that any kind of gun control scheme that includes registration of all guns, is never going to happen. Why not discuss options that are feasible rather than outlandish ideas that will go nowhere?

I don't know of any gun owners who want the government having a list of all the guns we own. That's something that just won't go over well, I promise.

Should be obvious. The point is the kid murdered someone with something other than a gun. Take away guns, next thing will be knives and baseball bats. Or, at least require liability insurance on those items in case they are used for murder.

If they commit murder, of course. Why would someone's line of work make a difference on their punishment.?

Most kids who want to hunt are introduced to it by their parents. My daughters are 10 and 12 and they both want to hunt. It helps that we eat wild game regularly, and they love it. They also know it's much healthier than what is available at the grocery store.

I'm talking about murder, not self defense. Didn't think I'd have to specify that. Of course I'm for the death penalty for someone who commits murder. And it should happen in a very short amount of time, let's say two months max.

No, that's not it. It's people's busy lives these days, kids in sports and other after school activities, and all the electronic distractions, that keep kids away from "real life." Everybody has to eat, some kill their own meat, while other people pay others to do it for them.

I'm totally fine with stricter punishment. How about death penalty required for anyone who kills another person with a firearm? I'm with you on that!

I hunt to get away from technology and the modern world. I have no interest in a gun with a trigger that's electronically regulated. And yes, guns and ammunition DO need to remain affordable. It's already expensive enough and it's becoming difficult to get young people interested in taking up...

Let's hear ideas then that will prevent us from having any more dead kids. The latest ideas I'm seeing seem to only want to make guns and/or ammunition so costly that the average person could no longer afford to have guns. I've heard electronic triggers, liability insurance, and tax ammunition...

I guess not because I certainly can't agree with most of the ideas I hear from others.

That was probably me. I bought my daughter a rifle for hunting. It's a bolt action that holds three cartridges in the magazine. I highly doubt it will ever be used to commit mass murder, or any murder for that matter. It's in a safe and my daughter doesn't have access to it. She doesn't care...

IMO, requiring some sort of electronics on a gun to read a person's fingerprint before it will fire, IS the same as banning all guns. Because guns now are not like that, and if they are in the future, they would be unaffordable for most people.

I've already stated that. Background checks for all gun sales, and minimum age of 21 for gun purchases.