Search results

You're correct I shouldn't have posted the first line, and I apologize.

Of all the reasons people give this one bothers me the most. Imagine you sacrificed 6 weeks of your life to the state, and as a result of serving you received: Shady media coverage calling you a dope by the Nancy Grace crowd. Not welcome signs posted around town. Death threats. How would you feel?

What you are suggesting is a felony. Same goes for those this forum who are threatening members of the Jury. Same for those who want to hurt the Anthony family. I really love some of the intelligent minds on this forum, but if calling the person I quoted a lynch mob ******* gets me...

Those are all great questions. Unfortunately don't think it's possible to get an answer because 1: we don't know when the chloroform entered the trunk, 2: we don't know how it was contained, 3: to many variables (wind flow through the trunk, how long the trunk aired out, did Casey try to air it...

You're weeks late unless the defense gets a second opening. I think they just call the first witness.

It's a big case in Florida from what I gather, but where I live she would be fine. I might be the only one in the State who could recognize her. If I were her and morality was not a question: I would get off the East Coast, have someone ghost write a book for me, and retire. I find...

1/1000th of a drop would be a good "ball park" estimate +- a factor of 10. If someone can tell me the background level of chloroform expected for decomp and what level was found I could give you an (nearly) exact number. The reason I am saying that 1/1000th of a drop is what I would expect is...

Chloroform is an excellent solvent. It's used for making many drugs such as LSD, MDMA, and high quality hash. You could use it as a date rape drug, or drug your child. Make a chemical bomb with it (breaks down into Phosgene) . Use it to make purified industrial chemicals, the list is...

Whatever the outcome I'm glad this is coming to an end.

I think we're on the same page I just wanted you to clarify. Thanks. I have similar reasons for being a skeptical juror. There are too many cases that seem open and shut at first glance. I the number of people freed from death row is about 140 post-Furman.

If you're saying that you want the duct tape evidence excluded I have to disagree. Circumstantial evidence is evidence. Juries misinterpreting circumstantial evidence is no different than a Jury that is presented bad physical evidence or bad jury instructions. As for the rest, I agree, there...

It's not that simple though. Casey may not be guilty of first degree murder, but the jury may predispose themselves to that charge not based off her personality, but the fact that Casey very likely knows exactly what happened to Caylee. And it's difficult for a sane person to believe that...

It depends on how she died, I've considered the possibility the duct tape may have been part of the body disposal not the actual homicide.

Thread title is a bit deceiving but I like the idea. Personally I think she could be not guilty on premeditated or felony murder, but is probably guilty of manslaughter. The biggest problem I have though is we still have no idea what happened to Caylee, I don't buy the prosecution theory and I...

LOL take it from a certified nerd who follows contract, copyright and trademark cases more often than crime, lawyers/judges are VERY ignorant when it comes to technology. Fun reading: MAI v Peak Vernor v Autodesk

Sounds correct. (looked it up 15 minutes before I got here). If the state decides not to use challenges today we may have a jury.

No I don't think so, the courts apply the "reasonable person" test. PJs aren't supposed to be legal experts.

Wishful thinking, however she and the State are past bargaining. IMO.

DT's been pretty bumbling and incompetent through this process but I think they're doing a good job here. I got no h8.

(Serious) I have a strange feeling she's writing/drawing inane babble that has nothing to do with the case. As for her demeanor... bi-polar anyone?