Search results

This is typically done with the death of a child. The Zahau family is free to start a charity in Rebecca's name if they see fit.

Coping with grief by doing good (a basic tenet of Judaism): http://matzav.com/the-leiby-kletzky-memorial-fund-coping-with-grief-by-doing-good

The Leiby Kletzky Memorial Fund: http://www.jta.org/news/article/2011/07/22/3088661/parents-of-leiby-kletzky-release-statement-create-memorial-fund Issued ONE DAY after sitting shiva. Was this a PR move?

Why would you think an act of Judaism is a PR move? Do you not realize you are insulting Judaism by insulting what is a common practice in the faith when you lose a child?

It's part of Judaism. It was actually a courageous thing to do. It shows he was able to think of others during his time of grief, just like he and Dina did when they donated Max's organs to other children.

It's a common practice in Judaism to name a charity after a lost loved one. Little Leiby Kletzky had a foundation named after him, too. The charity need not be related to the person (for example, a cancer foundation can be named after a child who did not die of cancer). It merely exists to do...

Except that it's been done before.

Not to mention allegedly riding a scooter over a railing, swinging from a chandelier, while hitting a wall, slamming a back on a railing, and going down the stairs and getting a scooter across a leg while not getting a single chandelier cut, and doing it all without a sound. Remarkable.

The word "lied" wasn't used. "Discrepancies" was.

57 lbs. still works with the formulas and scenarios given.

It's directly quoted and linked a few pages back, as well as on the original Max death thread.

I've linked both the SW and AR. Anyone can read both documents themselves and see that there are discrepancies between statements made to different officers.

His age makes it all the more unbelievable that he was able to do gymnastics, contortions, and Evel Kneivel-like stunts from the railing of a stairway while bringing down a chandelier, two balls, and uttering the word "Ocean" with an unplugged spinal cord that rendered him unable to breathe.

Respectfully, there is a large difference between one bizarre mishap that was witnessed by a parent, than a series of bizarre incidents allegedly witnessed by no one while a child was in the care of a babysitter and her teenaged sister.

I believe the AR are accurate. I don't see a discrepancy between what the SW said, and the AR said. One doesn't necessarily negate the other. I have never made a post about anyone being angry about anyone going to a gym.

The differences between what she was credited with saying in both the AR and SW. Both links are posted on this thread.

I haven't accused anyone of killing MS, nor do I believe that the medical conclusion as stated in the AR is wrong. I believe that there remains unanswered questions about what happened to MS prior to receiving his final, fatal injury. I also don't believe LE is covering anything up.

The AR

http://www.thedailybeast.com/newsweek/2011/09/18/what-really-happened-in-the-coronado-mansion.html The brother-in-law confirmed that and the shopping trip in a recent interview. The link to that should be posted in this thread.

I posted a link in a previous post (this thread) that explains the doctor's concerns and the AR results.