Search results

i've lurked for a while, making sure that i wouldn't be attacked for differing opinions- just started posting here- but you are right, the atmosphere here is WAY different than on other sites- look forward to seeing your opinions posted here! :seeya: -t-

don't know if you saw any of the interviews with the casey anthony jurors, but they did review the case. they took it seriously. they had doubts. ultimately, those doubts were the fault of the prosecutors- who should have done a better job with GEORGE (imho). i feel that casey murdered her...

i understand why you would think this , particularly when watching high profile cases- but my experience has been that juries usually get it right. the founding fathers wanted to be sure that our peers were hearing our cases. a professional juror would be no different than trial by judge-...

while they weren't testified to, the journal was admitted into evidence- and thus, unless otherwise instructed by the judge- anything in it can be considered by the jury. (rules of evidence)

the foreperson IS a professional juror! LOL he is a court certified mediator in the state of florida. the prosecution clearly made a mistake by not striking him from the jury. just another example of how inept they were. and i say this as an ex prosecutor. i do agree that a juror...

i am new as well, haven't posted but have read and been happy that the people here are reasonable.

not really. i do this when there's a lot of noise around me.