Search results

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
  1. Katheryn65

    MSM coverage of Baby Lisa, 11/18/11

    I think Jersey would, he had nothing to lose and he knew he was going back to jail anyway. I don't have my drug price cheat sheet handy, but How much meth can you buy with 300.00??
  2. Katheryn65

    MSM coverage of Baby Lisa, 11/18/11

    Laughs, I backspaced the last part out of my post which said ...unless they set up the abduction. I always found it odd that in an early interview DB crying into Jeremy said "What am "I" going to do" instead of "We" I do think this abduction thing could hold some truth, and yes if DB or JI were...
  3. Katheryn65

    MSM coverage of Baby Lisa, 11/18/11

    IF <---- notice the big if, this turns out to be what happened, it would make everything fit in with what happened, hopefully BL is found safe! And IF this turns out t be true, the first thing I will do is send a letter of apology to DB/JI for thinking one or both were involved.
  4. Katheryn65

    MSM coverage of Baby Lisa, 11/18/11

    A 17 yr old girl? Would that be the babysitter?
  5. Katheryn65

    MSM coverage of Baby Lisa, 11/18/11

    It hasn't aired yet...coming up...something about Taco saying Jersey said he was paid to abduct BL. LE would have to confirm this for me to believe it.
  6. Katheryn65

    MSM coverage of Baby Lisa, 11/18/11

    Levi Page had Ron Rugen on the radio show last night. Uploaded today and can be heard here. http://www.blogtalkradio.com/levipage/2011/11/18/lisa-irwin-case/scrub/0
  7. Katheryn65

    "Jersey" and MW #2

    I agree, it's one thing to be a drug dealer, but a kidnapper or child killer is a whole other game imo.
  8. Katheryn65

    "Jersey" and MW #2

    I wasn't indicating where the video came from, that really doesn't matter. I'm certain if LE requested surveillance video a store owner would hand it over, if not willingly with a warrant. Little things such as this could mean a lot in a case like this. It seems that we learn a new little...
  9. Katheryn65

    "Jersey" and MW #2

    Yes, if she did go, there would absolutely be video of it, especially these days, so If LE (or shall we call them) the "defense team" wanted to verify a TL of who was there and when for either the innocence/guilt of DB/JI then why hasn't that video been put out there? Remember, it was SB...
  10. Katheryn65

    "Jersey" and MW #2

    That is very possible about the video, although I would want to verify everyones whereabouts whenever possible. I too believe that the phones and baby Lisa are one act. I just always look at all possibilities in cases until they are proven implausible. These cases (I won't say always) but...
  11. Katheryn65

    "Jersey" and MW #2

    That is all true (as far as what I understand) with the phone call situation. However, isn't it possible that one of the people there that night could have grabbed one or all of the phones while they were inside the house to use the bathroom or something and then used it afterwards? If DB was as...
  12. Katheryn65

    "Jersey" and MW #2

    Hmmm, Based on DB/JI statements, I haven't been able to "determine" that. I don't believe a word that comes out of their mouths anymore. I'm sure the LE will "determine" if any of the phones did work or did/didn't have restricted service though.
  13. Katheryn65

    "Jersey" and MW #2

    I never said it did, I was strictly talking about the cell phones and the call that was made. Nothing says the two incidents have to be tied together.
  14. Katheryn65

    "Jersey" and MW #2

    Something else I find interesting about this case. DB says ONE cell phone out of the three wasn't working. Take a listen at 4:50 on this video Baby Lisa&#39;s Parents Take Questions From Reporters - YouTube
  15. Katheryn65

    "Jersey" and MW #2

    Exactly, and IF all of that is accurate and doesn't change again....As much as I think DB did it, who's to say one of the guests didn't use the restroom from 4:30 to 10:30 and take the phone with them? As far as I'm concerned anyone near the phones that night could have made that call.
  16. Katheryn65

    "Jersey" and MW #2

    That would be true if we knew for sure who used the phone. There were so many people that came and went during the stoopaholic that night anyone of them could have used it or taken it with them when they left. I'm sure they all had to use a restroom at some point, so they would have been inside...
  17. Katheryn65

    "Jersey" and MW #2

    I myself do not believe DB and MW knew/knows each other. I think some connection would have come up by now. Although this doesn't make me think DB is innocent either.
  18. Katheryn65

    "Jersey" and MW #2

    Exactly how I feel as well. And by looking at others point of views you can get a whole different perspective about all of it. It's all about having an open mind about it all until we do get the answers that piece this entire case together.
  19. Katheryn65

    "Jersey" and MW #2

    Yeah, I just still don't buy it. Small time thugs like Jersey don't jump into kidnappings or killings he is 42 (if I remember correctly) his whole life has been spent in and out of jail for what I would call small time crimes compared to kidnapping and killings. If anything, maybe it was...
  20. Katheryn65

    "Jersey" and MW #2

    Not sure if this is the same Docket or not, but here is what I know. JOHN TANKO and court case number 11CYCR03875. The case status is now: Removed due to confidentiality

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
133
Guests online
2,933
Total visitors
3,066

Forum statistics

Threads
603,252
Messages
18,154,082
Members
231,686
Latest member
Bfwbnfts
Back
Top