Search results

I've been wanting to post this for so long, but just didn't know how to articulate it. Kudos to you!

Same here! I am always on the Prosecution side, I don't presume innocence until proven guilty. Sorry, I am just that way. :facepalm: I believed the media hype in this case and presumed GZ guilty as I normally do with defendants going to trial. Whoops....BIG whoops - I was wrong THIS time...

They were Defense witnesses BEFORE they were State's witnesses. But, the State presents their case first and in my opinion their witnesses already proved Self Defense. ' Again, JMO

FYI... One of the defense attorneys will be on Pier Morgan show tonight. I forgot which one. I think MOM.

In my opinion... it should.

AND... What was the deal with TM staring GZ down and walking around his truck while GZ was in his truck on the phone with NEN? Did THAT show fear on TM's part?

TM had ear buds, I don't think he had a phone to his ear. I think all this opinion on whether TM looks suspicious or not, depends on our own neighborhood? A loitering person in the rain (pouring as one neighbor described) WOULD definately look out of place in my neighborhood. In fact? Maybe even...

But, at the end of the day (and I hate that overused phrase)... the world was talking about the defense opening statement and not the really good and emotional opening statement by the prosecution. Brilliant?

And the JURY will be smart enough to realize this, so I don't know why the prosecutor keeps harping on the cuss words.

I'd say ... frustration.

But he knew he screamed for help during the encounter, so it must be him. I don't recognize my own voice either and if it's in a state of high emotion? All the more I don't recognize it. MOO

IMO, the one pinned to the ground having his nose punched and head hitting the ground and not able to reach his gun at the moment would be the one screaming for help. The one on the bottom screaming makes most sense. The one with the injuries before the gunshot would make most sense of the...

I agree. THIS judge is Pro Prosecution. So obvious. My Opinion only.

I also don't recognize my own voice when I hear it on an answering machine, but I surely KNOW that it is. Don't we all do that? I did NOT say TM's mother is a liar. I've lied before in my life, and don't consider myself a liar. I said, it is MY OPINION that SM is lying on the stand and she...

In my opinion, it is TM's family that is lying on the witness stand. Very sad indeed. At first it wasn't TM and now it is. My opinion is that they full well KNOW that it isn't TM screaming for help, but they know what they NEED to say to get GZ convicted of murder. All my opinion only.

Wouldn't/couldn't GZ reasonably assume that his neighbor who yelled out was actually witnessing the fight? Would GZ shoot someone in front of this known witness if NOT in self defense? And... When GZ gave his statement, it wouldn't be a far reach to think that he didn't have several...

As far as I'm concerned this case should wrap up TODAY! This very credible eye & ear witness that was the CLOSEST to the fight has stated that GZ was on the bottom screaming for help. GZ is have very visable injuries. Prosecution witness' seem more for the defense. NO WONDER the State did...

Do you think Rachel had embellishments? She heard wet grass. Credible? JG was the closest witness to the event and he SURELY does NOT want to be involved in this. I wonder who's been threatening him. Because THAT is just sickening.

Can anyone tell me, what/why TM's phone became disconnected from Rachel? What made the call end after the grass sounds? Has anyone ever been butt dialed? I have and since I was just bored, I stayed on the line listening to my hubby deal with a customer. I hung up after about 30 min. Also...

Besides the CA bogus verdict there was.... Robert Blake and O.J. Simpson. Overwhelming forensics in all cases! I like the idea of "Professional Juries".