Not that it matters because, really, it's like seeing animals in clouds, but . . . unless the photo has been "strightened" Travis would have had to have had his head tilted about 10 degrees right for the image to show what the expert alleged.
This is why I think expert witnesses should be hired by and paid for by the court. No allegiance to either side. Nothing to gain in being biased. The way experts manipulate things to make a case for their "client" (the lawyer that hires them) is shameful. It's become so blatant as to be...
Poor Samuels. He's chosen to become a professional witness so every appearance he makes in court is, in effect, a job interview for his next case. In this situation, he can watch his professional witness career float away.
So I am confused. Didn't Jodi say she made the post-murder phone call message as a calculated means of deflecting suspicion? (She didn't use those words but didn't she say something like that?) And this witness says it was due to some psychological effect. That doesn't help Jodi, does it...
Can someone clarify for me?
According to Jodi's story she shot Travis first, then went in search of a knife. Where did she say the knife was? Didn't she say Travis knocked the gun out of her hand to explain why she didn't shoot him twice? Wouldn't Travis then have gone for the gun and shot...
Definately 3 hours earlier than EST this time of year. I used to live there. (2 hours in the winter due to Daylight Savings Time which AZ doesn't participate in. I think that's why people get confused.)
Did anybody notice the jury question was (paraphrasing) "How is it you cannot remember exactly how much money Travis lent you but you remember every cent you lent him" was responded to in reverse? She said she knew how much she owed him because it was in her journal. She didn't say this by way...
1. Testimony under direct that she stood on the bench to get to the gun, followed by testimony under cross that she used the shelf (which we've already established wouldn't hold her weight).
2. Obtain her driver's license in use at the time to prove that she either DID know she requires...
I so wish JM wouid get ahold of Jodi's driver's license for the year Travis was killed. There is a vision test required. It will prove one of two things. (1) Jodi did require corrected vision to drive, meaning she's lying, or (2) establish that her vision wasn't bad enough to even register...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.