there are a couple of recurring themes that she carried on in to her plea yesterday that really BUG me.
(A) That whole attempt to feign ignorance as the reason for her actions
"I never knew how good glasses could work until that fateful day I put on someone else's glasses who miraculously...
Nurmi has always gotten on my nerves for (among many things) the way he talks to the jury or the court by gesturing with one hand over and over again and looking down. When he does this, he looks like rainman without the math skills.
The astonishing thing about JA's "sympathy" phase (as she probably refers to it) is now that she need sympathy, she doesn't hide her face behind her hair like on the stand. She want's to make sure every juror sees her fake emotion. She even pulled her hair back today so she couldn't hide her...
Yes, I think you nailed it. It's like she's trying to dominate the conversation with over-annunciation. She also blinks less than most people, which is why I think she had a hard time producing fake tears on the stand or or at the defendant desk/table. I think she believes she has more power...
HAH! I would swear she's blistered the back of her throat considering how hard she smacked the back of her tongue against it when she uses a word with a K in it. It's like some kind of crazy sound effect you'd hear in a pixar movie. At a minimum she would've strained her tongue/muscle.
Snipped by me.
That's what I was thinking too. She's such a hypocrite for saying she wants death, and then her attorneys turn around and file this motion to remove the death penalty from potential sentencing. They could not file that motion unless she signed off on it (I don't think.)
Watching her answer those jury questions a while back drove me nuts because she had this "know-it-all" attitude (worse than the rest of the time). The judge would read a question, and she'd turn to the jury with the attitude like, "Ok, your confused, but let me use my einstinian brilliance to...
yeah, I looked at a couple of posts and the comments. The general theme is JA has made no mistakes, EVERYONE is out to get her, the jurors are idiots or scared by the public mob into voting for M1, yadda yadda yadda.
Many go as far as to say "there is absolutely no evidence. It must've been...
What's worse is JA and JW laugh when he said that like Nurmi is giving a graduation speech and he just mentioned a joke about JA's yearbook picture. It's like bizarro world in the region of the court room.
I thought Samuels was there to validate PTSD which would support her "me no remember nothing" excuse when it comes to the butchering and murder (or murder and butchering). I thought ALV was there to validate the claim of battered stalker syndrome, or whatever the battered claim is, in order to...
yeah, that's seems to be a major concern for any "slam dunk" case over the past couple of decades (maybe since OJ?). I can't remember who it was, but after the Casey Anthony verdict, someone on HLN said, and I'm paraphrasing, "The jury confused 'beyond a reasonable doubt,' with 'beyond a reason...
nope, just a guy with hopes precedent is not set for murderers to skate the charges by claiming fog and dragging their victim throught the gutter.
Given I'm new here, what is BBM?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.