theshadow45
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Mar 17, 2015
- Messages
- 5,608
- Reaction score
- 11,976
Iola Jane Doe has been unidentified for 36 years today.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
***** | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Upper (R to L, 01-16) | NI | F | F | F | F | N | N | P | P | N | N | F | F | F | F | NI |
Lower (R to L, 32-17) | NI | F | F | F | N | NO | P | NO | N | P | P | N | N | F | F | NI |
***** | 32 | 31 | 30 | 29 | 28 | 27 | 26 | 25 | 24 | 23 | 22 | 21 | 20 | 19 | 18 | 17 |
***** | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
***** | 32 | 31 | 30 | 29 | 28 | 27 | 26 | 25 | 24 | 23 | 22 | 21 | 20 | 19 | 18 | 17 |
CarlK - Carlene Brown is on the rule-out list. I'm assuming since her DNA is still listed only as "initial inquiry underway", they based this rule-out on the dentals?
CarlK - Carlene Brown is on the rule-out list. I'm assuming since her DNA is still listed only as "initial inquiry underway", they based this rule-out on the dentals?
I've submitted Margaret Holst to have her compared. Her DNA is available to compare to the UID (dentals are unavailable).
A new article about IJD's case:https://www.cbsnews.com/news/texas-detectives-find-new-leads-in-decades-old-murder-case/.
"She was small in stature she was probably five foot three, we believe she had auburn hair, which we are testing now," Wagnon told KBTX.
Yes, it does sound like they are. Which is great, that can only help her case.Bringing this article forward. Did anyone catch this from it or am I just late to the party? Cuz it sounds like they might be doing isotopes on her.
(BBM for focus):
Something I'm wondering about is the previous injuries that this Jane Doe is described as having. In addition to the broken ribs and sternum that are often cited as possible evidence of previous abuse she also had several broken toes that had healed. I'm by no means an expert, but when I heard that the first thing that came to my mind was 'car accident' rather than abuse. Here's my reasoning: the airbags in a car could easily cause trauma to the chest when deployed, even more so if you're either the driver or front seat passenger. Foot injuries are also very common, particularly in head-on collisions while sitting in the front because the lower extremities will absorb the shock of the impact. Does that make sense?