Not sure how you can possibly say Droc and the other guy aren't on the radar. The
police interview with Droc was in December 2014 and was reported widely in the media, along with the claims
about the taxi driver.
WAPOL ignored him for years. He claimed WAPOL are and were corrupt. I have to go through all his hodge-podge of
info and claims to confirm when he started raising his voice again. Bear in mind, someone from BF approached him
regarding a blog he made. As far as I know the blog had Droc's email and this is how he was contacted.
At the moment I'm 60% police are targeting him to either get him back for pestering them for so long, or simply
crossing their T's and dotting their i's and having a look at him in order to rule him out. The other 40% is
"Droc's a serious suspect".
Droc claimed the taxi driver and the girl picked up the victims together, then to another site south.
Droc claimed a factory in WGV and a Freo address but I reckon given the fire and his deception about his own
addresses on BF that it may well be Myaree or Henderson.
I'm going to have to go and confirm his deception. Do you know which place he was living at during the murders?
My understanding is he lived in Myaree with TT and the prossie. Not an exactly private place to take victims.
After 20 years, what sort of evidence could have he been hiding? Blood stains maybe? Souvenirs maybe?
It is all on BF in his posts. He claimed the girl was a pro who worked out of Northbridge, and did rehab
at Wellard. It was claimed the taxi driver drove her around and he was a southern suburbs local. You wouldn't
abduct someone from where you were locally well known - that is, not Northbridge, Freo or southern suburbs. You
would chose another hunting ground in the western suburbs like Claremont, where you wouldn't be as easily
recognised.
But they could have done Subi, Vic Park, Scarborough, Leederville etc
And I doubt the taxi driver would be idly sitting on rank for a job either...
The person who picked up SS could have been waiting in O'Bierne Tce, Mount St, Chatsworth Tce, in one of the car
bays at the front of business premises on Stirling Rd or driving past doing laps. From memory you can't really
park on Stirling Rd facing south.
Droc is dead. The online creepiness and games from his ex mates and associates continue. Why?
Which associates? Are you saying other people other than TT are making creepy comments? And has TT made any of
those comments after Droc died?
If I was publicly named in an investigation online and was innocent, I'd sue for defamation and slap a "cease and desist" on the owner of the website to take down the offending posts. The latter would be pretty cheap to
do. Can't see any of those Droc made his claims about having done that - instead they persist with their online
antics despite his death. Why?
a) They are involved
b) They are involved in something else similar
c) In their world the accusations are absurd and so ridiculous they laugh at it
d) They revel in the accusations
Question: How did Droc know TT was in Claremont on the CG night? If TT was involved, then you'd think he wouldn't tell Droc. Is Droc speculating or does Droc know because he was involved?
Why did Droc refuse to make a statement / complete the questionnaire, given he claimed to have already provided
info to police over the years? Particularly given his later online claims? Refuse the DNA sample too.
a) He's involved
b) He thinks he might be framed because something similar has happened to him previously
c) He hates police
d) b + c combo
A week
after a suspicious fire at his old house which the arson squad are investigating (the fire of which he failed to
mention in 400+ posts and tried to conceal the details of by deleting the stat dec he posted with the details of
that address mentioned - a rather large mistake on his part along with many others).
This is definitely suss.
And why were there only three people on BF, out of all those who had previously shown interest in his story over
400+ posts, actually challenge Droc or comment on the sensational claims made in that final letter and his final
post - which included a group outline and alluded to more than CSK.
a) They didn't need to. You were doing it for them (albeit too agressively)
b) Some people (like me) didn't want to scare him away before he put everything out there with an intention of putting him to the test once all his claims were out.
c) Lost interest in Droc's inability to articulate a clear story. Some people would have just put him down as being a nutjob and walked away
You can lock me down for an abc combo.
Almost universal silence on the final post
by Droc from a previously fully engaged BF audience - in fact after that post there was an enormous attempt to
redivert back to dated POI and theories. Why didn't you Bartho comment on that final post by Droc, given you
claim to have invited Droc onto BF to give his side of the story, and are so fully engrossed in all things CSK?
abc combo.
What's your theory on why I didn't say anything.
ps The content of PM's should be kept private.
