... let’s focus on what our aims are, which I believe are, coming to terms with what the accused actually did and why, in order to help the two/three young ladies and any “possible” others victims who have lost their lives.
Coming to terms with what the accused actually did?
We have evidence of what the accused actually wrote on his Facebook account, but unfortunately we are not allowed to discuss this.
We have evidence of what the accused did in his Little Athletics, Amateur Aussie Rules life, and having raised a daughter to adulthood.
We don't have evidence of the accused actually did in relation to being a Claremont Serial Killer, a killer, a rapist, or any other criminal activities.
We only have the charges as produced by WAPOL.
The legal charges on Bradley Robert Edwards (the accused), are not yet proven to be what the accused actually did.
The accused has not yet pleaded to any of these charges.
As I understand it, the evidence (ascertained by the prosecution to date), of what the accused is accused of doing (the charges), is in an ongoing process of being, or has been presented to his legal defence for their consideration.
It is too early in the legal process, to know what the accused actually did, and whether the accused did everything he is being accused of.
The accused has not been charged with any offences relating to the disappearance of Sarah Spiers, which increases the likelihood that she was the victim of a killer(s) that is both not the accused, and who is possibly also a serial killer(s).
Given the above, rather than discussing why the accused did something he has only been charged with, shouldn't we focus more on the Sarah Spiers disappearance and presumed murder?
