14 october 2011 press conference

[Wishbone]

LOL,,,,Fox news never did air the presser. Guess they didn't think it was newsworthy........

 

[momtective]

As hung up on Caylee's case as Nancy Grace was and as much as she has mourned Caylee, I'm really thinking it's her and her husband who are the wealthy benefactor's. Who else do we know that has such a passion for missing children and a huge bank account? It's got to be her. jmo

 

[TheDuchess]

Looks like a lot of blood money being made off baby Lisa....wonder what the going rate is on home movies of missing babies?

Don't you think that is a stretch to accuse the parents of seeking financial gain from this tragedy?

Why...because she bought a box of wine in the store and left the front door unlocked?

 

[Kamille]

He sure has managed to tic off alot of media today. Baby Lisa NEEDS the media.

grrrrrrrrrrr

Can someone tell me what they did in those first couple of days that was so bad? Before the "deal" was announced by the family member? All I saw was them giving the parents lots of air time to get the story out. No dirt flinging.

I can understand why they are digging for dirt now. They've got nothing else and they're pi$$ed.

MOO

 

[raeann]

IMHO...
I believe that LE already knows the answer to that question. If Deborah was that drunk, she would've still shown signs of intoxication at 4:00 AM.
I also doubt a drunk 25 year old with no previous history of being criminally diabolical could kill and hide a baby without being discovered by now.

That is where I get lost on this THEORY that so many seem to have decided is absolute fact. HOW does that theory work? Does it follow that a 25 year old mom whom NO one ever even once stated has in any way had a drinking problem, or in any way been anything but the best of mothers, who has a neat and clean house, whose children look very well cared for and well dressed and clean...how does it follow that person would out of the blue drink an entire box of wine by herself? Even if she did..... how does an intoxicated person who most likely would fall asleep as opposed to become violent....how does this person who does not drive and is logically too utterly intoxicated to walk far after drinking a box of wine...how does that person hide an accidental or intentional death? No broken glasses, no knocked over end tables or chairs, no spilled wine, no items dropped in the yard or along the street, no cuts or bruises from falling down or walking through scrub brush in the woods or along the river? I just don't see logic in that whole scenario--in fact, logic would tend to lean toward an intoxicated person NOT being involved due to the few facts that we do know.

jmo

 

[mck16]

She directed all Secret Service research on school shootings, insider threats, stalking, and other types of targeted violence, . .

http://campusthreatassessment.org/index.php/faculty/bios/marisa_randazzo/

Well her entry makes at least a little sense anyway. If this child was abducted most of us agree that it is most likely that it was personal and that the perp had familiarity with this family. So the stalking/targetted aspect would certainly apply IMO

Sounds to me like she maybe a profiler. Maybe can give some details as to who, or what kind of person would do this. jmo

 

[BetteDavisEyes]

Well, perhaps she wasn't sought out so much for her specialty, but because she has some connection through the family and knows a lot about these types of cases and also has a lot of contacts for additional resources. JMO

Seems that Dr. Randazzo has worked with Stanton previously, and a cursory search about her turned up a Dateline show that featured the pair.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/1750817...ll_breaking_and_entering/t/breaking-entering/

 

[Patty G]

He's from NY isn't he? A lot of people there use that term for children of all ages.

Yes, he is a New Yorker, and that is not an excuse to say "kid" when addressing a baby that is missing. :banghead:

 

[Kimster]

I'm beginning to think In Da Middle should start selling peanuts. The circus seems to have come to town. :sick:

I'm so sorry, little Lisa! :tears:

 

[EllaMae]

My guess would be that either the parents have recieved threats or they anticipate that the parents might recieve threats. So they brought in a big gun threat assessment psychologist to help them prioritize any threats.

And they are giving warning to anyone who may have issued a threat or be anticipating making any threats.

That is exactly what I think. I believe it already has happened, and that's why the parents went out of sight, and are not staying at their home.

 

[luckyme]

Seems that Dr. Randazzo has worked with Stanton previously, and a cursory search about her turned up a Dateline show that featured the pair.

OH MY!:innocent:

 

[tlcya]

I'm kind of warming up to ol' Wild Bill. If all we'd seen was the just-ended presser plus cousin Mike Lerette's statement earlier, at the "fiasco event," this would be a plus day. Docked a notch because of disorganization early.

Woofie, I am seriously worried. Are you feeling alright??

lol

 

[lag28wa]

I am so confused, I listened in, I didn't get a picture, just sound.

So, is he saying that the benefactor that enlisted is help is the same benefactor that is putting up the 100K reward?

And he has a trustworthy third party person who has talked to the benefactor to make sure they're real?

What?! Is that normal? So convoluted!

 

[Amster]

Don't you think that is a stretch to accuse the parents of seeking financial gain from this tragedy?

Why...because she bought a box of wine in the store and left the front door unlocked?

No, not at all! The exclusive with national media is what caught my attention. As far as I know, I have said not one word about wine or door being unlocked.

 

[linda505]

I couldn't listen and reading I got confused. Is the person who is paying for this (reward and people) know or not know the family?

Humor me
If the benefactor is related to the family and they also sent a threat assesment specialist in - is it possible that there has been some sort of contact asking for ransom to someone? Or is it possible that the family is aware of someone that they think could have targeted them for some reason?

 

[Kimster]

Can someone tell me what information regarding Lisa's disappearance was gleaned from these pressers today? I'm at work and unable to grasp it all.

:tyou:

 

[lag28wa]

I do love that when Maria Antonio(a?) (KMBC reporter - KMBC being the Biggest PITA in the neighborhood) asks about the family talking to the media, BS says 'just because they are not talking to YOU doesn't mean they aren't talking to the media'. ROTFL!
Not at BS fan, though.

Is she the woman with the OBNOXIOUS voice?

 

[askfornina]

I'm kind of warming up to ol' Wild Bill. If all we'd seen was the just-ended presser plus cousin Mike Lerette's statement earlier, at the "fiasco event," this would be a plus day. Docked a notch because of disorganization early.

i agree. all this negativity is confusing me. this guy may not be perfect but he is trying. he is making an effort. Marissa Randazzo looks promising. i'm giving this guy a chance. i am still giving the family the benefit of the doubt. looking forward to new developments.

 

[Wishbone]

I'm beginning to think In Da Middle should start selling peanuts. The circus seems to have come to town. :sick:

I'm so sorry, little Lisa! :tears:

This is just wrong.

 

[Kat]

I couldn't listen and reading I got confused. Is the person who is paying for this (reward and people) know or not know the family?

Humor me
If the benefactor is related to the family and they also sent a threat assesment specialist in - is it possible that there has been some sort of contact asking for ransom to someone? Or is it possible that the family is aware of someone that they think could have targeted them for some reason?

Yes that's what I heard. (not related but connected)