wenwe4
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 6, 2008
- Messages
- 9,499
- Reaction score
- 7,359
RS&BBM, and thanks wenwe for the response...
I'm trying to see where the defense (keep trying to type "offense") is going...
What I am afraid of is that the defense will say that because the tape was held to the remains via the hair, there is no evidence that it was applied before decomposition set in enough to inhibit adhesiveness from tape to skin. In this scenario, the tape was applied after decomp set in/after KC likely last had contact with the corpse, and the hair was used to adhere the tape over the face... And KC didn't do it, and even if she did she didn't put the tape on...
Does any of that make sense?
I don't believe this, and I don't like typing it. But we cannot underestimate the depths to which the defense will sink as they grasp for a plausible straw... :furious:
I completely understand where you are going with this (you little devil's advocate - you), however I think the original positioning of the tape could potentially highlight a death mask if in the right lighting. Personally, I feel if the defense were to go with this theory, it would give them a very limited window of time, given decomp fluids, bloating, skin sloughing off, etc. What would be the purpose of applying the duct tape over her face after death (except maybe to contain the decomp fluids from leaking while transporting the body). Just my musings.
IIRC most of the discussion about the fibers on the duct tape were moved to that thread - so there may be more on the black wool fibers there (it's been awhile since all that hard work by WS'rs was done).
btw - see pg 16 on this thread for tape positioning theories