imo, if he testified to the inaccuracies of Baez statements, it would contradict Cindy's email that the waiver was in exchange for access to the TES records. He would have to say his client was lying.
Yes, and that leads us to where he is today. Baez could not have made claims in his motions without mom and pop's enthusiastic endorsement and exhibits, these dots are pretty close together to connect .Brad is saying , publicly, those are lies, the person who wrote them and the attorney perpetuating them are responsible for that.
In the "It depends what the definition of is, is" Bill Clinton style, I imagine Baez is twisting words around. Brad may have said something like Mark never would have let me look at those records if he didn't have the waiver mom and pop signed ( meaning that Mark
already had it ). Baez could have ran with that and wants to make it seem Brad said unless mom and pop will sign one, or signed one at the time he asked to see the records. imo. Jose Baez has known for a very ,very long time.... since this first came up.... that Brad and Linda ( under the exact same proviso as the defense, no copying, no note taking , whatsoever ,) reviewed and tagged documents of TES. We had several hearings where it was discussed. The only one this is new news to is either Mason, or perhaps on the lawyers Baaez's poses questions to on his light serve. Mr.Baez better hope and pray that Mr. Nejame's waiver does not predate any would be misunderstood words that he and Andrea heard in his office from Brad. Unfortunately for Mr. Baez he was less than grateful and respectful about Andrea's departure when she left, so if he is looking for her to get on board with how he remembered it, I imagine she will not. In the words of Judge Strickland, "This is where posturing can get you into trouble".
Let's review;
Baez asked for the prosecutors to be removed from the case, all three of them, career civil servants;,
Baez asked for them to be sanctioned, claimed they charged this case with impermissible motives, everything from gender bias to ...you name it;
Baez and Mason called for the judge to step aside;
Baez, Andrea, Todd and Mason have accused Mark Nejame of conflicts of interest;
today it is Brad Conway, with the bulls eye
Who among is thinks the boy who cried wolf gets taught a lesson by story's end?
As an officer of the court, imo, Brad had no choice but to let the court know those are inaccurate statements in the defense filing. Resigning the post may be perfunctory, getting it on the record the truth of the matter I agree with. Notice you saw no Affidavit from Andrea Lyon as an exhibit. Right?
MOO
