2011.01.04 Defense Motion to Suppress Casey's Statements to LE

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves

New Posts

What gets me about this motion (and for some reason I have never read the first one before this amended one) is that CM says KC was held in the room with the door shut after the "Universal tour" (he honestly calls it that). WHO HERE REMEMBERS YURI OR JA SPECIFICALLY SAYING TO THAT .... girl..."OK - We just have the door shut for privacy. You are free to go at any time" or something to that effect?
 
LancelotLink said:
If Jose has bothered to pick up a phone and ring me up, I would've told him his client was lying about these occurrences. But Noooooooooooo...
Click to expand...

OMG! I just spit my diet coke!!:floorlaugh::floorlaugh::floorlaugh
 
TotallyObsessed said:
What gets me about this motion (and for some reason I have never read the first one before this amended one) is that CM says KC was held in the room with the door shut after the "Universal tour" (he honestly calls it that). WHO HERE REMEMBERS YURI OR JA SPECIFICALLY SAYING TO THAT .... girl..."OK - We just have the door shut for privacy. You are free to go at any time" or something to that effect?
Click to expand...

They say that in every interview and this is why...so the witness can't say she was being detained.

ETA: Yup. Right on page 1: http://www.docstoc.com/docs/6036055...ice-Interview-at-Universal-Studios-1320-Hours
 
TotallyObsessed said:
What gets me about this motion (and for some reason I have never read the first one before this amended one) is that CM says KC was held in the room with the door shut after the "Universal tour" (he honestly calls it that). WHO HERE REMEMBERS YURI OR JA SPECIFICALLY SAYING TO THAT .... girl..."OK - We just have the door shut for privacy. You are free to go at any time" or something to that effect?
Click to expand...

----universal interview-----

detective melich:


Um, the date right now is July 16th, 2008, it’s about 1320 hours. We’re at Universal Studios I’m here with Sergeant Allen, um, I’m here with Detective Appie Wells, um, also here with Casey Anthony.

Q And Casey, we talked earlier this morning and we’re working a case looking for your daughter Caylee,is that correct?

A Yes.
​
​
​

​


Q-Okay. We came here to Universal Studios, we’re sitting in a little conference room. Obviously the door’s unlocked. We just closed it so we could have a little privacy and talk to you.
 
These latest motions just amaze me. Here's a question for all of you here, now I have finished banging my head on my desk, taken 3 tylenol and am glancing at the vodka bottle.

Two years ago, were we not paging through these interviews, all of them, with ICA, the OCSD and the LE - at length? Did we not read every word, word for word? Did we not discuss them forwards, backwards, looking at every statement, every lie, darned nearly every breath ICA took? Did we not discuss why, how, what should, would, could happen. And haven't we done that same thing at least three times on at least three separate occasions?

Here, let me answer for you!!!

Yes, we have! We can almost repeat them verbatim. Is Baez saying he has JUST read them now and has decided to object and ask for them to be excluded from the evidence at trial? Seriously??? S-e-r-i-o-u-s-l-y?? :loser::banghead:

Where was I? Oh yes, my poor head and is it too early to have an adult beverage......

ps: okay maybe it wasn't 2 years ago and just feels like it.
 
TotallyObsessed said:
What gets me about this motion (and for some reason I have never read the first one before this amended one) is that CM says KC was held in the room with the door shut after the "Universal tour" (he honestly calls it that). WHO HERE REMEMBERS YURI OR JA SPECIFICALLY SAYING TO THAT .... girl..."OK - We just have the door shut for privacy. You are free to go at any time" or something to that effect?
Click to expand...
AZlawyer did a perfect job explaining that at the time. Here's a link to a very informative post: [ame=http://www.websleuths.com/forums/showpost.php?p=5966597&postcount=1544]click.[/ame] You can find more info on this subject in that topic, just browse through pages 62 and up.

HTH :seeya:
 
logicalgirl said:
These latest motions just amaze me. Here's a question for all of you here, now I have finished banging my head on my desk, taken 3 tylenol and am glancing at the vodka bottle.

Two years ago, were we not paging through these interviews, all of them, with ICA, the OCSD and the LE - at length? Did we not read every word, word for word? Did we not discuss them forwards, backwards, looking at every statement, every lie, darned nearly every breath ICA took? Did we not discuss why, how, what should, would, could happen. And haven't we done that same thing at least three times on at least three separate occasions?

Here, let me answer for you!!!

Yes, we have! We can almost repeat them verbatim. Is Baez saying he has JUST read them now and has decided to object and ask for them to be excluded from the evidence at trial? Seriously??? S-e-r-i-o-u-s-l-y?? :loser::banghead:

Where was I? Oh yes, my poor head and is it too early to have an adult beverage......

ps: okay maybe it wasn't 2 years ago and just feels like it.
Click to expand...

FANTASTIC POST! :toast: and when this case is involved, it's 5:00 somewhere....
 
LancelotLink said:
If Jose has bothered to pick up a phone and ring me up, I would've told him his client was lying about these occurrences. But Noooooooooooo...
Click to expand...

You see Lancelotlink the thing is..Baez does not want to do the ringing he wants everyone else to give HIM a ring..so you see..it's still everyone else's fault but his...
 
logicalgirl said:
These latest motions just amaze me. Here's a question for all of you here, now I have finished banging my head on my desk, taken 3 tylenol and am glancing at the vodka bottle.

Two years ago, were we not paging through these interviews, all of them, with ICA, the OCSD and the LE - at length? Did we not read every word, word for word? Did we not discuss them forwards, backwards, looking at every statement, every lie, darned nearly every breath ICA took? Did we not discuss why, how, what should, would, could happen. And haven't we done that same thing at least three times on at least three separate occasions?

Here, let me answer for you!!!

Yes, we have! We can almost repeat them verbatim. Is Baez saying he has JUST read them now and has decided to object and ask for them to be excluded from the evidence at trial? Seriously??? S-e-r-i-o-u-s-l-y?? :loser::banghead:

Where was I? Oh yes, my poor head and is it too early to have an adult beverage......

ps: okay maybe it wasn't 2 years ago and just feels like it.
Click to expand...

bbm
:therethere: here you go..:martini:
 
logicalgirl said:
These latest motions just amaze me. Here's a question for all of you here, now I have finished banging my head on my desk, taken 3 tylenol and am glancing at the vodka bottle.

Two years ago, were we not paging through these interviews, all of them, with ICA, the OCSD and the LE - at length? Did we not read every word, word for word? Did we not discuss them forwards, backwards, looking at every statement, every lie, darned nearly every breath ICA took? Did we not discuss why, how, what should, would, could happen. And haven't we done that same thing at least three times on at least three separate occasions?

Here, let me answer for you!!!

Yes, we have! We can almost repeat them verbatim. Is Baez saying he has JUST read them now and has decided to object and ask for them to be excluded from the evidence at trial? Seriously??? S-e-r-i-o-u-s-l-y?? :loser::banghead:

Where was I? Oh yes, my poor head and is it too early to have an adult beverage......

ps: okay maybe it wasn't 2 years ago and just feels like it.
Click to expand...

Sounds like the SNL skit with Seth and Amy, "Really?"

"Two years ago, were we not paging through these interviews, all of them, with ICA, the OCSD and the LE - at length?"

Really? Really!

"Did we not read every word, word for word?"

Really? Really!

"Did we not discuss them forwards, backwards, looking at every statement, every lie, darned nearly every breath ICA took?

Really? Really!

"Did we not discuss why, how, what should, would, could happen?

Really? Really!

"And haven't we done that same thing at least three times on at least three separate occasions?"

Really? Really!

:banghead::banghead:
 
cyberborg said:
Sounds like the SNL skit with Seth and Amy, "Really?"

"Two years ago, were we not paging through these interviews, all of them, with ICA, the OCSD and the LE - at length?"

Really? Really!

"Did we not read every word, word for word?"

Really? Really!

"Did we not discuss them forwards, backwards, looking at every statement, every lie, darned nearly every breath ICA took?

Really? Really!

"Did we not discuss why, how, what should, would, could happen?

Really? Really!

"And haven't we done that same thing at least three times on at least three separate occasions?"

Really? Really!

:banghead::banghead:
Click to expand...

Here! :martini:

I'm happy to share.
 
NoNameLeft said:
AZlawyer did a perfect job explaining that at the time. Here's a link to a very informative post: click. You can find more info on this subject in that topic, just browse through pages 62 and up.

HTH :seeya:
Click to expand...

Thank you NoNameLeft. Thanks to AZLawyer I feel ok even IF the Universal stuff is suppressed. After all, she didn't say anything really except she admitted she had lied. Isn't that one of the charges here? False statement to LEO?
I just have to keep the faith that with all of the other evidence that has been amassed in this case, she will be found guilty no matter if the Universal stuff is in or out.
 
nums24 said:
2011.02.15 - Amended Motion to Suppress Statements (Thank you MuzikMan!)

http://www.docstoc.com/docs/71719679/20110216-Defense-Amended-Motion-to-Suppress-Statements

For reference, here is the original motion filed on 1/3/2011 (late): http://www.wesh.com/pdf/26367661/detail.html


The amendment to today's motion is the addition of numbers 11 and 12, they are now asking that the October 14, 2018 statements to LE be suppressed.

This is what they are additionally asking to be suppressed:

Part 1: http://www.wftv.com/video/19107079/index.html

Part 2: http://www.wftv.com/video/19107107/index.html

Part 3: http://www.wftv.com/video/19126676/index.html
Click to expand...
Ok...I know this case has aged me...but I don't remember anyone asking her questions after her indictment...at least not related to the crime she was charged with. Wasn't this when Casey said she was willing to talk...and they made a call to JB?
 
RR0004 said:
Ok...I know this case has aged me...but I don't remember anyone asking her questions after her indictment...at least not related to the crime she was charged with. Wasn't this when Casey said she was willing to talk...and they made a call to JB?
Click to expand...

Wasn't that the day she sat there in her white shirt, said she would talk - promptly asked for Baez, the LE left her there and we watched the constant preening until Baez got there and said forgetaboutit?
 
wasnt this the interview where she was going to speak to the police then she wanted to call her lawyer to get it sorted mr baez arrived and she clammed up off to jail for her on his say so I take it sooooooooooooo the first thing i would have done as her lawyer was looked at this video to see exactly what went on before i got there There is no way he hasnt looked at this for over 2 years
 
TotallyObsessed said:
What gets me about this motion (and for some reason I have never read the first one before this amended one) is that CM says KC was held in the room with the door shut after the "Universal tour" (he honestly calls it that). WHO HERE REMEMBERS YURI OR JA SPECIFICALLY SAYING TO THAT .... girl..."OK - We just have the door shut for privacy. You are free to go at any time" or something to that effect?
Click to expand...
I hadn't remembered the part of being escorted by not only the police...but those big bad Universal security guards.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

DNASolves

Who is Fairfield County Jane Doe (1993)?

Members online

... and 144 more.
Total: 372 (members: 145, guests: 227)

Online statistics

Members online
145
Guests online
227
Total visitors
372
Totals may include hidden visitors.

Forum statistics

Threads
609,379
Messages
18,253,420
Members
234,647
Latest member
KatlynS
Back
Top