Chiquita71
New Member
- Joined
- Feb 3, 2009
- Messages
- 3,835
- Reaction score
- 2
JB: the trash was wet, and you put it in a dry room and it was dry?
yes
JB: the purpose of that is to dry them and get rid of liquid?
yes
JB: I will show you "c"
yes
JB: (is holding pictures, (blown up) of food items) see that sir?
yes
JB: is not near mic) these two photos look completely different?
correct
JB: that is because you put them in the dry room
yes
JB: you did inventor after they came out of the dry room?
yes
JB: you did not know this would be critical evidence?
correct
JB: it was not your intention to destroy any evidence?
correct
JB: utlimately that is what happened?
objection
sustained
JB: you had no idea the evidence would be altered?
I received the trash and I proceed to perserve it
JB: ?
I preserve it and I don't destroy evidence because the evidence is there, put it in box, normal proceedure.
JB: no one is accusing you of destroying evidence...
LDB: ?
JB: was it you that packaged, I am showing you state's evidence "ac", (not near mic) may I publish?
HHJP: you may
JB: thank you judge, can everyone see that? now these are paper towels collected from the trash?
yes
JB: they were at one time moist and then placed in dry room and then dry?
yes
JB: then you put them in a plastic bag?
yes
JB: should items need to be tested for DNA you should not put them in plastic bag?
yes, but I did not need that at that time
JB: at that time, if someone had an accusation that was more than trash
objection
reask
JB: it was important enough to put in plastic bag
I put in plastic bag
JB: you didn't know if later on it should be tested for DNA
I inspected the napkins very well, I don't see any thing of forensic value to test for DNA
JB: you know DNA doesn't just test blood
correct
JB: you can test saliva
it would be difficult
objection
move on
JB: semen?
to my knowledge yes
JB: you can unpublish judge. it was not your intention to alter or destroy this piece of evidence?
objection
sustained
JB: ?
LDB: why is it you need to dry these items?
when we inspect the evidence, it is protocol to dry, better condition to inspect the items. when the items are very dry, like blood on clothing it is a better condition to be examined.
LDB: if it is wet, is there a concern it will become moldy?
correct
LDB: where they could breath, in paper?
correct
LDB: the carpet you discussed removing from the car, was that also dry?
yes
LDB: the item you did place in plastic, was there evidence of bug larva?
I don't remember specifically.
JB: you dry evidence correct?
yes
JB: air samples were later take of the dry garbage?
no recollection of that
JB: same
no, the trash? no
JB: miss LDB mentioned there was insect larve?
I answered I have no recollection of that
JB: (stupid question)
objection
sustained
JB: you know you can collect DNA from any cell of the body, do you not?
HHJP: outside the scope, may the witness be excused? Thank you.
yes
JB: the purpose of that is to dry them and get rid of liquid?
yes
JB: I will show you "c"
yes
JB: (is holding pictures, (blown up) of food items) see that sir?
yes
JB: is not near mic) these two photos look completely different?
correct
JB: that is because you put them in the dry room
yes
JB: you did inventor after they came out of the dry room?
yes
JB: you did not know this would be critical evidence?
correct
JB: it was not your intention to destroy any evidence?
correct
JB: utlimately that is what happened?
objection
sustained
JB: you had no idea the evidence would be altered?
I received the trash and I proceed to perserve it
JB: ?
I preserve it and I don't destroy evidence because the evidence is there, put it in box, normal proceedure.
JB: no one is accusing you of destroying evidence...
LDB: ?
JB: was it you that packaged, I am showing you state's evidence "ac", (not near mic) may I publish?
HHJP: you may
JB: thank you judge, can everyone see that? now these are paper towels collected from the trash?
yes
JB: they were at one time moist and then placed in dry room and then dry?
yes
JB: then you put them in a plastic bag?
yes
JB: should items need to be tested for DNA you should not put them in plastic bag?
yes, but I did not need that at that time
JB: at that time, if someone had an accusation that was more than trash
objection
reask
JB: it was important enough to put in plastic bag
I put in plastic bag
JB: you didn't know if later on it should be tested for DNA
I inspected the napkins very well, I don't see any thing of forensic value to test for DNA
JB: you know DNA doesn't just test blood
correct
JB: you can test saliva
it would be difficult
objection
move on
JB: semen?
to my knowledge yes
JB: you can unpublish judge. it was not your intention to alter or destroy this piece of evidence?
objection
sustained
JB: ?
LDB: why is it you need to dry these items?
when we inspect the evidence, it is protocol to dry, better condition to inspect the items. when the items are very dry, like blood on clothing it is a better condition to be examined.
LDB: if it is wet, is there a concern it will become moldy?
correct
LDB: where they could breath, in paper?
correct
LDB: the carpet you discussed removing from the car, was that also dry?
yes
LDB: the item you did place in plastic, was there evidence of bug larva?
I don't remember specifically.
JB: you dry evidence correct?
yes
JB: air samples were later take of the dry garbage?
no recollection of that
JB: same
no, the trash? no
JB: miss LDB mentioned there was insect larve?
I answered I have no recollection of that
JB: (stupid question)
objection
sustained
JB: you know you can collect DNA from any cell of the body, do you not?
HHJP: outside the scope, may the witness be excused? Thank you.
