Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'm trying to be fair and really listen to the evidence presented by the DT team, but 3 hours of this? For what?! To say, "No blood"? "No DNA on shovel"? Okay, but why on God's green earth does it take THREE HOURS to get that information out? I sure didn't need an hour lesson on DNA to understand THAT.
Does KC even realize today marks three years?
Does KC even realize today marks three years?
And Dr. Vass and Dr. G were both very hostile toward JB/CM. Expected?
How can one fbi with another fbi agent concluded the same thing with different findings?
I wouldn't read anything in to it. She just may feel the need to take a look at the defense because she has someone's hands in her life and wants to make sure before she'd convict. We can't read into anything the jury does or say. I remember some of the talking heads were convinced one of the jurors in the Scott Peterson case was pro-defense, but she voted to convict.
I'm trying to be fair and really listen to the evidence presented by the DT team, but 3 hours of this? For what?! To say, "No blood"? "No DNA on shovel"? Okay, but why on God's green earth does it take THREE HOURS to get that information out? I sure didn't need an hour lesson on DNA to understand THAT.
Juror 4 now reviewing her notes...
by stevehelling via twitter at 1:10 PM
Look, I went there this morning...and it were NONE TOO PRETTY! The tweets when she got on the stand were that she was the DT's own FBI witness. Huh?
But I have been trying to give her the benefit of the doubt because she is EXTREMELY SMART and I don't think the DT could have found this smart a witness for themselves. :loser:
Juror 4 now reviewing her notes...
by stevehelling via twitter at 1:10 PM
And Dr. Vass and Dr. G were both very hostile toward JB/CM. Expected?
Isn't that improper?JB is not liking this! Watch his face if you can see him. He keeps shaking his head no and yes.
I thought the judge said that the notes were private, and were "yours and yours alone."
I'm really not thrilled with this witness. I hope all her colleagues at the FBI are following her testimony. Witnesses need to be like the first witness we saw today. Totally impartial. They don't need to be rude to the DT but they shouldn't be difficult with the SA either.
So far JA has had to pull answers out of her.
And Dr. Vass and Dr. G were both very hostile toward JB/CM. Expected?