I am very frustrated with scientists that ask me to ignore my own common sense and believe what they are telling me, without giving me some kind of scientific principle to base the knowlege on.
We all have common knowledge. We know that generally speaking, what goes up, must come down. The hair would slide to the lowest position as it was released from the scalp. This is gravity. Easy. And then WS tells us it would not. But he gives us no reason why. No reason to leave our common knowledge behind and believe what he says. Why didn't the hair slide to the lowest position? What kept the hair attached to the top of the scalp?
I'm not buying it. It may be a minor point - but I don't like being asked to put aside what "I know" to accept some presumption there is no scientific principle for, or that the scientist thinks I wouldn't understand - so I should just trust him. Frustration.
And ICA is ...... I can't say - 'Beach will get me LOL
We all have common knowledge. We know that generally speaking, what goes up, must come down. The hair would slide to the lowest position as it was released from the scalp. This is gravity. Easy. And then WS tells us it would not. But he gives us no reason why. No reason to leave our common knowledge behind and believe what he says. Why didn't the hair slide to the lowest position? What kept the hair attached to the top of the scalp?
I'm not buying it. It may be a minor point - but I don't like being asked to put aside what "I know" to accept some presumption there is no scientific principle for, or that the scientist thinks I wouldn't understand - so I should just trust him. Frustration.
And ICA is ...... I can't say - 'Beach will get me LOL