LOl..yep...right to the office of someone who post's right here on WS :rocker:
Are you serious?? That one I did NOT know.
LOl..yep...right to the office of someone who post's right here on WS :rocker:
I agree with you!! They had witnesses to call and did not. Something legal made them stop the trial.I respect (most of) RH's opinions. But I don't agree with him on this. I don't believe that HHJP would throw away an entire day of testimony AND seal the record if it were simply housekeeping issues. Plus he (HHJP) said it wasn't related to the previous argument about Furton. And I don't see HHJP lying about that - or anything else, for that matter. JMO
of course :doh:
Talk about stupidity!!! I cannot understand for the life of me an ex LE officer smelling decomp. in his daughters car and not calling 911, then try to call his daughter...then he goes to work??? Cindy goes back to work??? None of this makes any sense to me and it's hard to believe this early they were in cover up mode.
Well here's what I don't get:
Casey knew she didn't work at universal, but she walked LE right up to the door of her "office". Among some of the other whoppers she told them that night/morning.
Delusion apparently runs in the family.
LDB made a big deal of CA calling GA to ask about the ladder. I know she did this to later prove that there are no records of CA calling GA from her cell or landline that day.
However, I REALLY wanted LDB to ask CA if she called ICA to ask about the ladder. No one has asked her as far as I see. If they did, and CA said she didn't ask ICA - they should ask "why not?".
I also really wanted LDB to ask CA to tell the "ladies and gentlemen of the jury" if she still has her pool up in her yard - as we all know she does. Yes or no answer only please!
And if she answers truthfully, LDB should just turn to the jury with one eyebrow raised and simply say "Thank you Mrs Anthony, no more questions"
RH is saying he believes aggravated manslaughter is the correct verdict and the one he expects...FWIW
Did I read correctly before CM's meltdown in court yesterday the LE went Baez's office?
To answer a question on the last page, no, no one can prevent Casey from testifying if she stands up and declares her intent to do so, not her lawyers and not the judge...
I was listening when he said that, I thought he said aggravated child abuse that resulted in her death=felony murder. Still a capitol case and he'd leave us to hash it out.
Guess everyone believes ICA should get aggravated manslaughter according to RH....sad... ;(
I was listening when he said that, I thought he said aggravated child abuse that resulted in her death=felony murder. Still a capitol case and he'd leave us to hash it out.
I was thinking that same thing during the testimony. How could you keep a pool (especially an above ground that you could easily get rid of) that you think your grand daughter drowned in.
One of my dogs drowned in my parents pool. A landscaper mistakenly let her into the yard. She specifically wasn't allowed in that area of the yard because she was a bulldog and they can not swim. We had even made sure that we told each and every one of the landscapers that the dogs were not to be let into the yard but a new guy came as part of the crew one day. We saw him walking into the yard (within literally five minutes of his arrival) and we went down to tell the new guy not to let the dogs out. But it was too late, he had already opened the door to the basement, the dogs went out and our bulldog drowned. It all took place within a 5 minute window of time. So - the point of this long story is that I never could swim in that pool again. Luckily my parents ripped it out and had a new one built in a different spot. I'm not sure I could have ever looked at that pool and NOT thought about what had happened. I can't even imagine keeping a pool that one of my own grand children drowned in.
He did already say that. GA framed Casey for Caylee's murder. That being the reason for the duct tape.
I know...but I am one of the ones who did not know the details of this case before April or so of this year...and if not for WS threads, I would not know what this family is like, would not have a clear picture of the dynamic between Cindy and Casey at all. I know motive does not need to be proven, but right now, as a "juror" I would not be able to make that leap that Casey just decided one day to kill Caylee. Personally, I think her motive was very personal and targeted Cindy-she wanted to hurt Cindy in the worst way, just because she could. Not just for her "beautiful life" as Cindy was always going to give in and babysit in the end...
I was listening when he said that, I thought he said aggravated child abuse that resulted in her death=felony murder. Still a capitol case and he'd leave us to hash it out.
That makes more sense....TY!!!
I don't know that anyone agreed, just that he said it, as his opinion.