My first (emotional) reaction is "I can totally understand why in THIS case, or one like it, you must withhold the jurors names for as long as a Juror wants it as there is a mob mentality right now"
It would be for some morbid curiosity and/or subliminal desire to see them harassed because many are in disagreement with their verdict.
I totally disagree with the verdict as I have a right to do. I am very curious to see what they thought individually, but I am a law abiding citizen who does not wish harm on anyone (not even Ex-ICA) should she walk outside...It would lower me to nothing more than an animal or criminal that I despise.
If a juror comes forward they do it of their own free will.
Some things in life are "logical" and many cases come and go and verdicts are handed down and nobody cares or even knows about them. Other verdicts are high profile and they put all the players of that movie in danger, so that tells me logically, we can't scare people from serving on a jury, they can't feel their safety or the safety of their family would be in jeopardy if they serve.
That being said...What the heck were they thinking!!!
Ok had to say it.. but still think they should be revealed only if they want to be. Trust me when I say they have heard all of our thoughts by now LOL