I don't even think this motion is necessary. The media just needed to have a little patience. Once the first juror does a paid interview, the rest will crawl out of their holes and start giving interviews as well. We would have heard from all of them in a few days or weeks anyway. I guarantee it. It wouldn't have taken long for Dateline or 20/20 to get them to interview as a panel either.
They wouldn't have to face such outrage if they had done the right thing IMO. There was a mountain of evidence they disregarded and they should be held accountable for not doing the job they were tasked with. I'm not saying they should be harrassed, but the public is owed an explanation when such a blatantly guilty person is allowed to walk.
It doesn't matter that they didn't know the hows, whys, or wheres, the evidence was compelling to convict her, even if it wasn't for murder 1. They did not want to look at the body of evidence and draw a conclusion, they wanted a smoking gun, they wanted a verdict to be handed TO them on a platter. They didn't want to work. They wanted to leave - our suspicions have been confirmed by Juror #2's statements to the press.