spyhouston
New Member
- Joined
- Jan 26, 2009
- Messages
- 334
- Reaction score
- 0
Why on earth was it impossible for this jury reach the conclusion that ICA murdered her child? THEN they could have their suspicions about GA but reach the conclusion that they were not sure what GA might have done but there was no evidence presented and GA was NOT ON TRIAL. Why Why Why Why was this so difficult for this jury? I will NEVER understand. Why didn't someone remember they COULD NOT base their decisions on opening/closing theories?