Schu7
New Member
- Joined
- Jun 16, 2011
- Messages
- 657
- Reaction score
- 0
TY!
You mark my words. When FCA breaks the law again, an argument will be made by her DT that her "probation" conducted as shoddily as it was, is the reason she should not have to answer for the charges. That the system failed her by allowing her to serve probation while incarcerated, thereby denying her the same opportunities afforded anyone else, that she was denied guidance or a chance to find gainful employment.
CM has that argument already done. JB is waiting to see where the money lies in this, before writing up his argument.:banghead: