ilovewings
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Mar 11, 2009
- Messages
- 9,224
- Reaction score
- 70,432
You certainly possess an excellent analyitical mind--I enjoy reading your posts-- so wellI personally am looking at this as a juror of the general public and I sincerely believe this is what will happen. This is my opinion only.
The way it works in the USA courts:
1.) A prosecution expert testifies
2.) A defense expert testifiies.
3.) THE JURY decides who to believe, who is more credible, what explanation is the most reasonable.
4.) Sy will testify (if judge allows him) about the cell tower evidence.
5.) The FBI CAST expert with 30 years experience will testify about the cell tower evidence - there is information about this in the PCA.
6.) The jury will decide which expert's explanation is the most reasonable.
Sy's and the prosecution's testimony and Motions on this subject are so confusing, convoluted and full of this:
A.) Possibilities
B.) Maybes
C.) Could be's
D.) If we had more information
.......Because of this......the jury will find that the CAST information from the FBI and other prosecution data experts is much more reasonable than Sy's evidence, and they will go with this.
Look, the number one most important piece of evidence for juries - I have posted links several times about this - is DNA evidence. DNA evidence alone with no alibi convicts defendants from 20 to 30 years ago.
BK's skin cell DNA evidence shows it is reasonable it is his DNA on the sheath under a victim in her bed. I believe the jury will see BK's DNA as being beyond reasonable doubt evidence that helps prove him guilty.
Unknown - at this time - evidence could come up via cell tower/phone evidence, but from what I know right now this post is my .....
2 Cents
Thought out.