I think I am starting to see how the IDIs here think
No single piece of evidence is strong enough to pin a R down on its's own.
But then why don't you guys end up in the 'i don't know' group?
No single piece of evidence is strong enough to pin an intruder down on it's own.
Or is the DNA it?
If there was no foreign DNA would you have changed your mind on the case?
No single piece of evidence is strong enough to pin a R down on its's own.
But then why don't you guys end up in the 'i don't know' group?
No single piece of evidence is strong enough to pin an intruder down on it's own.
Or is the DNA it?
If there was no foreign DNA would you have changed your mind on the case?