Depends on what "evidence" the State has, and how well the D manage to refute it. I don't think its unreasonable to wait to decide until we have more information...So even if this trial ends with a Guilty verdict, you are staying with him being innocent?
From your link; did they happen to have more recent figures?
I’m still perplexed by the unexpected cancellation of the public hearing. What pray tell could have caused that? What if, just what if, the D have finally made an undeniable link that places one of the third party actors at the scene of the crime during the time in which the girls were murdered. Wow! Wouldn’t that throw a monkey wrench into the State’s case? May also explain why JG hasn’t ruled against SODDI. She may have no option but to let it in
JMHO
I’m still perplexed by the unexpected cancellation of the public hearing. What pray tell could have caused that? What if, just what if, the D have finally made an undeniable link that places one of the third party actors at the scene of the crime during the time in which the girls were murdered. Wow! Wouldn’t that throw a monkey wrench into the State’s case? May also explain why JG hasn’t ruled against SODDI. She may have no option but to let it in
JMHO
I think it could be as simple as they had nothing to publicly discuss. After they took care of whatever they needed to do privately, if they had no other matters to discuss, then I think it makes sense to "cancel" that portion of the hearing.I’m still perplexed by the unexpected cancellation of the public hearing. What pray tell could have caused that? What if, just what if, the D have finally made an undeniable link that places one of the third party actors at the scene of the crime during the time in which the girls were murdered. Wow! Wouldn’t that throw a monkey wrench into the State’s case? May also explain why JG hasn’t ruled against SODDI. She may have no option but to let it in
JMHO
Okay, let's walk that through...one of the D attorneys somehow gets 'undeniable' proof that one of the rag-tag Odinist army was there at the bridge on the afternoon of the 13th...I’m still perplexed by the unexpected cancellation of the public hearing. What pray tell could have caused that? What if, just what if, the D have finally made an undeniable link that places one of the third party actors at the scene of the crime during the time in which the girls were murdered. Wow! Wouldn’t that throw a monkey wrench into the State’s case? May also explain why JG hasn’t ruled against SODDI. She may have no option but to let it in
JMHO
Yes, all of the family members deserve answers. Some form of what a lot of people call 'closure', although I don't know if there ever is any really. Abby and Libby are never coming back, but just maybe they can start to take one step forward towards healing. The community needs to heal as well.
It amuses me to see that NM has to work so hard to suppress his own discovery. If he has such a rock solid case against RA, he has nothing to fear, right? He’ll go in there and make mince meat of the D. Why would he care if the D make fools of themselves? His argument that it will confuse the jury is nonsense. All the jury has to do is listen to the evidence, all the evidence, and make a rational decision as to whether or not the State has shown BARD that RA is guilty. JMO
I’m still perplexed by the unexpected cancellation of the public hearing. What pray tell could have caused that? What if, just what if, the D have finally made an undeniable link that places one of the third party actors at the scene of the crime during the time in which the girls were murdered. Wow! Wouldn’t that throw a monkey wrench into the State’s case? May also explain why JG hasn’t ruled against SODDI. She may have no option but to let it in
JMHO
I don't think it's really working so hard to file a simple motion.. seems short and to the point. It is his job to present as clear of a case as he can so that it will be easy to follow for the jury. The defense will try to muddy all the waters so the jury is confused because they don't have any solid evidence to exclude their client from the bridge or from the trail from 130-330. They want the jury to be confused, the state wants it to be clear. This trial should not be going through every single thing LE did to investigate this case. It would take months to do that and it comes back to having zero to do with RA, who is on trial. Jurors have lives too and this shouldn't take 3 months just so the defense can drag it on calling everyone that ever was looked at to the stand and trying to pin it on them.
