flourish
Now With 30% More Emo
- Joined
- Mar 8, 2009
- Messages
- 6,392
- Reaction score
- 6,795
Hmm, well what do we have here? New item on the docket:
http://www.courtrecords.alaska.gov/pa/pa.urd/pamw2000.docket_lst?54330965
Looks like the defense's motion asking for potential grand jury members to be examined by the presiding judge has been denied. :gavel:
I wonder if this means that there will be a new grand jury...anyone know if the judge would have to rule on that motion if there wasn't going to be a new grand jury...like, do judges have to rule on motions that are moot, as this one would be if there wasn't going to be a new grand jury?
Curiouser and curiouser...
and now back to your regularly scheduled :waiting:
04/18/2012 PJ Order Denying Motion for PJ to Examine Potential Grand Jurors for Bias Case Motion #62: Motion For Presiding Judge to Examine Potential Grand Jury For Bias, As Required by Criminal Rule 6(s)(2), Alaska Rules of Court
http://www.courtrecords.alaska.gov/pa/pa.urd/pamw2000.docket_lst?54330965
Looks like the defense's motion asking for potential grand jury members to be examined by the presiding judge has been denied. :gavel:
I wonder if this means that there will be a new grand jury...anyone know if the judge would have to rule on that motion if there wasn't going to be a new grand jury...like, do judges have to rule on motions that are moot, as this one would be if there wasn't going to be a new grand jury?
Curiouser and curiouser...
and now back to your regularly scheduled :waiting: