My hubs (easy going guy!) always asks me about the cases that interest me. And, I told him, "A man killed his wife on a cruise ship because he said she laughed at him." First words out of my husband's mouth, "What man wouldn't want his wife to laugh on a cruise?" To me, my hubs reply was normal and typical of getting to the gist of a situation with one simple question.
So, (according to FBI report) "She wouldn't stop laughing at me" is NOT A NORMAL RESPONSE, juxtaposed to the horror of a blood-filled crime scene and a battered woman being dragged to a balcony. I'm sure the person who typed the FBI report was as dumbfounded (as are many of us) to type/read those same words. The action and response do not line up....example....I saw a spider on the wall, but got rid of it with a bazooka. Or a man, who was flunked by a DMV female behind-the-wheel test giver, was so angry, he drove his car into the building. Over reaction to seemingly mundane events we all experience in life. This will be psychological "why" for the defense.
So, (according to FBI report) "She wouldn't stop laughing at me" is NOT A NORMAL RESPONSE, juxtaposed to the horror of a blood-filled crime scene and a battered woman being dragged to a balcony. I'm sure the person who typed the FBI report was as dumbfounded (as are many of us) to type/read those same words. The action and response do not line up....example....I saw a spider on the wall, but got rid of it with a bazooka. Or a man, who was flunked by a DMV female behind-the-wheel test giver, was so angry, he drove his car into the building. Over reaction to seemingly mundane events we all experience in life. This will be psychological "why" for the defense.