Although it may be a really bad area, is there a reason to connect Danni with that place?
I too am curious if this is "Physic" information, or credible from a source information?
Although it may be a really bad area, is there a reason to connect Danni with that place?
October 12 would be a good day for another press release. It would coincide with the vigil, and would be an opportunity for police to clearly state what happened that caused them to request more information about her disappearance.
The most basic facts are missing from the first press release - such as Danni's full name, where she was last seen, what she was wearing, why she is considered a missing person, what type of car she had, that the car is also missing, and what type of information they need. It would also be helpful if they put together a digital map with points of interest and locations that people should think about on July 17. If they don't have a graphics person to put together a points of interest map, feel free to volunteer my services.
What I'm saying is that their press release lacked information and that without basic facts, no one knows that they should look for or remember.
October 12 would be a good day for another press release. It would coincide with the vigil, and would be an opportunity for police to clearly state what happened that caused them to request more information about her disappearance.
The most basic facts are missing from the first press release - such as Danni's full name, where she was last seen, what she was wearing, why she is considered a missing person, what type of car she had, that the car is also missing, and what type of information they need. It would also be helpful if they put together a digital map with points of interest and locations that people should think about on July 17. If they don't have a graphics person to put together a points of interest map, feel free to volunteer my services.
What I'm saying is that their press release lacked information and that without basic facts, no one knows that they should look for or remember.
One more tiny thought... What if the goals were for a court ordered class... This seems like something you would be required to do (list your goals) if you had to take a parenting class, or alcohol class, or something like that. Is there anyway to tell if she was ordered to take a class from the court @Alethea? The only reason I ask is that seems to be one of the sticking points for thinking she didn't walk away on purpose?
I ran a search for DNV's name in the Alabama public court records that would cover civil, criminal, drug, and domestic cases and the only record that came up was TT's custody petition (filed as TT vs. DNV).
This would not include anything that was sealed or related to a juvenile. Things like CPS investigations are confidential and are not included in public court records.
Thank you <3 You are the best! So it's possible it could be a CPS Court Ordered Class?
Or it could’ve been an assignment from a therapist. I know many adoption agencies offer counseling to the birth mother during and after the pregnancy. I could see her being asked to write down her goals to look forward to after the adoption.Thank you <3 You are the best! So it's possible it could be a CPS Court Ordered Class?
What are possible reasons why the press release neglects to mention any basic pertinent information about this case?
My ideas:
1. Incompetence- this isn’t their first rodeo so I doubt they don’t know what to include im a missing persons press release.
2. It’s intentional. They have a pretty good idea of what happened or at least who is involved but not enough information to locate DNV or make an arrest at this time. They’re speaking to a specific person(s) to urge them to come forward with that information so they don’t mention all the basic information bc it’s already known by their intended audience.
3. It’s all for show- DNV is alive and well and they want to draw out her or someone who knows where she is.
What are possible reasons why the press release neglects to mention any basic pertinent information about this case?
My ideas:
1. Incompetence- this isn’t their first rodeo so I doubt they don’t know what to include im a missing persons press release.
2. It’s intentional. They have a pretty good idea of what happened or at least who is involved but not enough information to locate DNV or make an arrest at this time. They’re speaking to a specific person(s) to urge them to come forward with that information so they don’t mention all the basic information bc it’s already known by their intended audience.
3. It’s all for show- DNV is alive and well and they want to draw out her or someone who knows where she is.
A digital map was requested - I mentioned the one from the Tibbetts case to JDT - but we ended up with the blog website instead.
Other than the one I've given that was shot down because telling y'all it didn't just come from a psychic wasn't sufficient, I'm not sure. But it's also the only other thing that makes sense - based on her plans for the night - as to why she was at the Shell station.
He seemed unprepared, unaware of the details and a bit nervous. Better preparation should make a big difference.
Agreed- I felt like there was an irritated undertone. Like someone was wasting his time. The statements about some people don't like to talk to police and if you know something you haven't told us..kind of felt like he was talking specifically to someone.
Cedgison can you explain what drug type assistance for work means? EAP type of assistance? Or something else?
My impression was that he was unfamiliar with the details. He initially described Danni's daughter as 4 months old, and he learned during the conference that Danni's daughter is 4 years old. That's a big mistake to make in terms of being familiar with the facts of Danni's disappearance.
No, I was talking about to help her get through her work day.
Unfamiliar was the impression I took from it, as well. But I don't know for sure what was going on.
I don't think harder drugs in the sense of heroin, cocaine, etc. nor has this been a speculation from the T family.
My speculation - and again, it's just that, my speculation - is based on this:
She went back to working doubles within a week of giving birth. Most doctors don't clear a woman for work until 6 weeks and DNV may not have been cleared to go back but she did. If we think about the pain, strain on the body, and emotions that come with having a baby and giving it up for adoption, what could she have used to help get her through her long workdays?